My all-time favorite jeep (general purpose) logging program is HyperLog, but
support has been discontinued, so I'm shopping for a new product.

Bought EQF-logger, but after a few months of use I still haven't gotten used to
the kluge-operator-interface, so I've written that one off.

Here's my list of MUST HAVE features:

An intuitive, non-rodent-centric operator interface, similar to the
simplicity of Hyperlog or CT (Mouse OK for non-routine functions, but logging
sequences must be
touch-typist-hands-on-the-keyboard-no-need-to-watch-the-screen.)

Radio control integration

LoTW integration

Import from ADIF

Good support from the author

Any suggestions?

de Hans, K0HB
--
{{{{* http://www.home.earthlink.net/~k0hb

Hi Hans,
You should most certainly look at EasyLog (www.easylog.com).
I have used it for a number of years and also tested other logging
softwares, but always turned back to EasyLog.
Take a look at it and feel free to contact med with questions.

73' Hans - SMØIMJ


KØHB wrote:

My all-time favorite jeep (general purpose) logging program is HyperLog, but
support has been discontinued, so I'm shopping for a new product.

Bought EQF-logger, but after a few months of use I still haven't gotten used to
the kluge-operator-interface, so I've written that one off.

Here's my list of MUST HAVE features:

An intuitive, non-rodent-centric operator interface, similar to the
simplicity of Hyperlog or CT (Mouse OK for non-routine functions, but logging
sequences must be
touch-typist-hands-on-the-keyboard-no-need-to-watch-the-screen.)

Radio control integration

LoTW integration

Import from ADIF

Good support from the author

Any suggestions?

de Hans, K0HB
--


{{{{* http://www.home.earthlink.net/~k0hb

"KØHB" wrote in message
k.net...
My all-time favorite jeep (general purpose) logging program is HyperLog,
but support has been discontinued, so I'm shopping for a new product.

Bought EQF-logger, but after a few months of use I still haven't gotten
used to the kluge-operator-interface, so I've written that one off.

Here's my list of MUST HAVE features:

An intuitive, non-rodent-centric operator interface, similar to the
simplicity of Hyperlog or CT (Mouse OK for non-routine functions, but
logging sequences must be
touch-typist-hands-on-the-keyboard-no-need-to-watch-the-screen.)

Radio control integration

LoTW integration

Import from ADIF

Good support from the author

Any suggestions?

de Hans, K0HB
--
{{{{* http://www.home.earthlink.net/~k0hb


Have you tried N1MM? Though I don't know how well it works for large
databases and I've only used it for contests although it can do general
logging.

Some people speak highly of the DXLab suite. I haven't tried it myself
though.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE

KØHB wrote:
My all-time favorite jeep (general purpose) logging program is HyperLog, but
support has been discontinued, so I'm shopping for a new product.
did you get stveie permission to use the word jeep that way

"an_old_friend" wrote

did you get stveie permission to use
the word jeep that way

Steve doesn't control my life the way he seems to control yours.

Jeep that!

Beep beep
de Hans, K0HB
--
Poster Child for the 1943 'Precocious Little *******' campaign

KØHB wrote:
"an_old_friend" wrote

did you get stveie permission to use
the word jeep that way

Steve doesn't control my life the way he seems to control yours.

no stvie doesn't control mine but nice doge for him

Jeep that!

Beep beep
de Hans, K0HB
--
Poster Child for the 1943 'Precocious Little *******' campaign

I am not going to argue with you since you wish the title
you have is it *******

an_old_friend wrote:
KØHB wrote:
My all-time favorite jeep (general purpose) logging program is HyperLog, but
support has been discontinued, so I'm shopping for a new product.
did you get stveie permission to use the word jeep that way

a full posting cycle from stvei and yet Hans is allowed to make up
words without a care from Stevie

just more proof stevie is the Asshole of RRAP

an old friend wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
KØHB wrote:
My all-time favorite jeep (general purpose) logging program is HyperLog, but
support has been discontinued, so I'm shopping for a new product.
did you get stveie permission to use the word jeep that way

a full posting cycle from stvei and yet Hans is allowed to make up
words without a care from Stevie

Hans didn't "make up" any words. Every word he use can be found
in any standard dictionary.

just more proof stevie is the ###hole of RRAP

Just more proof you're the drunken sloth of RRAP.

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
an old friend wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
KØHB wrote:
My all-time favorite jeep (general purpose) logging program is HyperLog, but
support has been discontinued, so I'm shopping for a new product.
did you get stveie permission to use the word jeep that way

a full posting cycle from stvei and yet Hans is allowed to make up
words without a care from Stevie

Hans didn't "make up" any words. Every word he use can be found
in any standard dictionary.

made menaing so sorry

just more proof stevie is the ###hole of RRAP

Just more proof you're the drunken sloth of RRAP.

what proof?

I don't drinnk stevie everytime you claim to "know" i dod you lie again

Steve, K4YZ

"an old friend" wrote

what proof?

Proof? You want proof? I'm right, and you're wrong, and I can provide the
mathematical proof.

It is obvious, even to you, that the opposite of right is left and that three
lefts
make a right or 3l = r.

It is also clear that wrong is the opposite of right so -w = r.

So this would make 3l = r = -w which means that 3l = -w. Now, since
left is the opposite of right (-l = r) this would mean l = r = -w, which
playing with the math gives me l = -r = w and so left is the same as
wrong (yes, I could have done this in fewer steps, but I didn't feel
like doing that).

Now, since l = w and 3l = r that would make 3w = r. This means
that three wrongs make a right. Of course, since 3 is an odd number,
this situation doesn't work out with any values for r and w except 0
which would mean that r = 0 and w = 0 and l = 0, although the last
one I don't really care about.

This means that right and wrong are mathematically identical and so
classifying things as right or wrong is pointless because both of them are
the same. And since there is no difference between right and wrong, that
would make ME always right and YOU always wrong and isn't that the
thing that rrap is all about?

2 + 2 = 8 if you assign sufficiently large values to 2.

Warmest personal wishes for the holiday,

de Hans, K0HB
--
If a `religion' is defined to be a system of ideas that contains unprovable
statements, then Kurt Godel taught us that mathematics is not only a
religion, it is the only religion that can prove itself to be one.