|
Really Hans, no call to be rude
void * clvrmnky() wrote:
On 03/01/2006 2:03 PM, Jeffrey Herman wrote: On 1 Jan 2006 16:52:58 -0800, wrote in Now, if you want to "build from scratch" totally, you will have to learn to SUCK all the air out of the tubes you build for yourself (honoring the "tradition"). It's so easy to look up facts nowadays, I'm surprised that you were unable to find this: "A 17-year-old named Haddaway had built his entire station from absolute scratch, including the making of his own vacuum tubes...." QST February 1921. I love hearing about that sort of thing. I recall an article reprinted from a later era describing how an old-timer used to build his own passive components. I actually built my own variable resistor from a test tube full of water and some copper wire from the instructions. Hearing that people would roll (literally) their own capacitors from various conductors and dialectrics really impressed me. If the argument is that it's easier to buy a ready-to-use rig, so be it. If the argument is that this has made do-it-yourself somehow obsolete or less valuable, I have to disagree. Exactly. I'll use factory-built gear, but I take comfort in knowing that if necessary (or desired), I can build my own gear, too. 73, Jeff KH6O WC2XSR/12 -- Chief Petty Officer, U.S. Coast Guard Mathematics Lecturer, University of Hawaii System |
Feeble Five Flounderings
K4YZ wrote: wrote: wrote: On 4 Jan 2006 14:51:01 -0800, wrote: well said It needs said. Steve is a rotten SOB who puts on a squeekie clean appearance for CQ magazine and QST. We KNOW better. All YOU know, Brainie, is that you are a bullie and a liar. is that you try to lie and deceive in this forum and I won't let you get away with it. You assume that you have control over other people. You do not. Real "issues" are not discussed nor "debated" in this "forum". Thanks to your fueding with every-damned-body, there very, very little room for actual civil discussion. Thanks a lot. With the lies and innuendo bestowed by you and your bretheren, it's nye-on impossible. Projection. And what YOU "know" fits in a thimble, and leaves room for seconds. Steve, K4YZ More projection. |
Steve's Projection
K4YZ wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: wrote: On 4 Jan 2006 14:51:01 -0800, wrote: well said It needs said. Steve is a rotten SOB who puts on a squeekie clean appearance for CQ magazine and QST. We KNOW better. All YOU know, Brainie, is that you are a bullie and a liar. Projecting again, Brain. Projecting! It's "Brian." is that you try to lie and deceive in this forum and I won't let you get away with it. You assume that you have control over other people. You do not. But I do. I respond to your comments. You respond in turn. I know that certain comments will elicit certain responses from you. It works. Your remarks, "Raped and old friend" have yet to elicit a explanation from you. Asking why you could post anything that despicable brings only silence from you. Real "issues" are not discussed nor "debated" in this "forum". Thanks to your fueding with every-damned-body, there very, very little room for actual civil discussion. Thanks a lot. There's an almost unlimited amount of bandwidth here, Brain. Indeed. Mark showed you that. If you need THAT much room, then perhaps you need to pare down your rhetoric a bit. Mark has asked why you need to comment on a person's sexual orientation in an amateur radio newsgroup. He has also asked you to eliminate your comments on people's sexual orientation in an amateur radio newsgroup. And my "arguments" are pretty well narrowed down to you and your Feeble Five bretheren. I can communicate effectively, if not outright get along with, everyone else here fairly well. Hmmm? Bill Sohl left. Few others are active. Best of luck communicating effectively with "everyone else." But then most of the rest of the folks here don't see fit to attack me or to lie in order to get a point across. Perhaps they think you're not worth the trouble. Others are just tired of your nonsense. You and your "brothers" have yet to master that. There is always your model. Mark has found it very effective. With the lies and innuendo bestowed by you and your bretheren, it's nye-on impossible. Projection. Nope. Not a bit. And what YOU "know" fits in a thimble, and leaves room for seconds. More projection. Nope. Careful obeservation, evaluation, assessment and summation. Steve, K4YZ If you're going to lie about yourself, you might as well make it a big one. And I see you have. |
Steve's Projection
On 14 Jan 2006 10:36:00 -0800, wrote:
K4YZ wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: wrote: On 4 Jan 2006 14:51:01 -0800, wrote: well said It needs said. Steve is a rotten SOB who puts on a squeekie clean appearance for CQ magazine and QST. We KNOW better. All YOU know, Brainie, is that you are a bullie and a liar. Projecting again, Brain. Projecting! It's "Brian." is that you try to lie and deceive in this forum and I won't let you get away with it. You assume that you have control over other people. You do not. But I do. I respond to your comments. You respond in turn. I know that certain comments will elicit certain responses from you. It works. dud you catch here where he said he get the posts he wants in rsponse? mean he wanted to use his daughter name etc, since he claims he is in control but if he is in control the respoblity is HIS Your remarks, "Raped and old friend" have yet to elicit a explanation from you. yes that has he claimed I deserved Asking why you could post anything that despicable brings only silence from you. Real "issues" are not discussed nor "debated" in this "forum". Thanks to your fueding with every-damned-body, there very, very little room for actual civil discussion. Thanks a lot. There's an almost unlimited amount of bandwidth here, Brain. Indeed. Mark showed you that. and stve did not like it If you need THAT much room, then perhaps you need to pare down your rhetoric a bit. Mark has asked why you need to comment on a person's sexual orientation in an amateur radio newsgroup. He has also asked you to eliminate your comments on people's sexual orientation in an amateur radio newsgroup. And my "arguments" are pretty well narrowed down to you and your Feeble Five bretheren. I can communicate effectively, if not outright get along with, everyone else here fairly well. Hmmm? Bill Sohl left. Few others are active. Best of luck communicating effectively with "everyone else." as I said I will try to bring down the house rather than leave it as Steve own personal abuse chamber But then most of the rest of the folks here don't see fit to attack me or to lie in order to get a point across. Perhaps they think you're not worth the trouble. Others are just tired of your nonsense. or they lack the abilty to step aside form their feeling for awhile and give you the treatement you give others You and your "brothers" have yet to master that. There is always your model. Mark has found it very effective. very efective indeed, disagreeable but effective that Only thing I don't unstand is how steve can keep it up all these years without stroking out or uffering some other complete colapse He can't be human in any meaningfull sense With the lies and innuendo bestowed by you and your bretheren, it's nye-on impossible. Projection. Nope. Not a bit. And what YOU "know" fits in a thimble, and leaves room for seconds. More projection. Nope. Careful obeservation, evaluation, assessment and summation. Steve, K4YZ If you're going to lie about yourself, you might as well make it a big one. And I see you have. indeed Steve is clearly a student of Herr Geobels (or a student of one his student) _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
Brain Bouncing Blindly,
wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: wrote: On 4 Jan 2006 14:51:01 -0800, wrote: well said It needs said. Steve is a rotten SOB who puts on a squeekie clean appearance for CQ magazine and QST. We KNOW better. All YOU know, Brainie, is that you are a bullie and a liar. Projecting again, Brain. Projecting! It's "Brian." Is it? Why don't you sign your posts like a man and show us all, Brain? is that you try to lie and deceive in this forum and I won't let you get away with it. You assume that you have control over other people. You do not. But I do. I respond to your comments. You respond in turn. I know that certain comments will elicit certain responses from you. It works. Your remarks, "Raped and old friend" have yet to elicit a explanation from you. No explanation was necessary. Asking why you could post anything that despicable brings only silence from you. How is it despicable? Markie has proudly boasted of perverted sexual and other personal preferneces, and did at one time indicate a prediliction for forceful sex, domineering relationships. Real "issues" are not discussed nor "debated" in this "forum". Thanks to your fueding with every-damned-body, there very, very little room for actual civil discussion. Thanks a lot. There's an almost unlimited amount of bandwidth here, Brain. Indeed. Mark showed you that. What Mark "showed me" had nothing to do with bandwidth and everything to do with his mental defect, Brain. Your on-going defense of him shows me (and the rest of the NG) yours. If you need THAT much room, then perhaps you need to pare down your rhetoric a bit. Mark has asked why you need to comment on a person's sexual orientation in an amateur radio newsgroup. He has also asked you to eliminate your comments on people's sexual orientation in an amateur radio newsgroup. He has. And I answered him. His response was to go on the aforementioned tirade. I've asked YOU why you insist on suggesting that others act one way and then do it yourself. You've answered with YOUR silence. And my "arguments" are pretty well narrowed down to you and your Feeble Five bretheren. I can communicate effectively, if not outright get along with, everyone else here fairly well. Hmmm? Bill Sohl left. Few others are active. Best of luck communicating effectively with "everyone else." You're here. What's YOUR excuse? Where's YOUR "meaningful debate" or "thoughtful intercourse"...?!?! Where are the answers to questions put ot you YEARS AGO on subjects you thought you'd never be challenged on, yet can't seem to get past...?!?! But then most of the rest of the folks here don't see fit to attack me or to lie in order to get a point across. Perhaps they think you're not worth the trouble. Others are just tired of your nonsense. Perhaps they won the lottery. Perhaps I'm not the only one that they have a "problem" with. MOST LIKELY is that this NG has accomplished exactly SQUAT, even when there was "meaningful intercourse". On the otherhand, one of my pieces in this forum was a featured article in Worldradio magazine (for which I was paid a fee, however I returned it uncashed). My comments are routinely quoted in "CQ" magazine. Myself and several other regular posters appear in various "CQ" quotes on a semi-frequent basis. And we have YET to see "N0IMD" in ANY such role. Not even a mention as a "slim" in any DX journal during "Restore Hope". Nor do we see KB9RQZ, N9OGL, Frankie of Silliland nor Lennie the Loser. You and your "brothers" have yet to master that. There is always your model. Mark has found it very effective. You better redirect credit where credit is due...To your "brother" in California. With the lies and innuendo bestowed by you and your bretheren, it's nye-on impossible. Projection. Nope. Not a bit. And what YOU "know" fits in a thimble, and leaves room for seconds. More projection. Nope. Careful obeservation, evaluation, assessment and summation. Steve, K4YZ If you're going to lie about yourself, you might as well make it a big one. And I see you have. See what? (Step away from the mirror and try again, Brain...You're confusing yourself....) Steve, K4YZ |
Brain Bouncing Blindly,
On 15 Jan 2006 07:03:18 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: cut is that you try to lie and deceive in this forum and I won't let you get away with it. You assume that you have control over other people. You do not. But I do. I respond to your comments. You respond in turn. I know that certain comments will elicit certain responses from you. It works. Your remarks, "Raped and old friend" have yet to elicit a explanation from you. No explanation was necessary. Asking why you could post anything that despicable brings only silence from you. How is it despicable? Markie has proudly boasted of perverted Proudly boasted? how did I do this? after some of the barbarian (including yourself) went digging around and reposted materail that I am not ashamed (just never thought they belonged her) I admknowledged them and we tried to go but you keep making a big deal of so I defend my right to be and to do what I wish amoug consetning adult if that is "Boasteing" sexual and other personal preferneces, and did at one time indicate a prediliction for forceful sex, domineering relationships. so what? I like dominating sex amoug consenting adults that is not rape and it does not cover Mark morgan caught on tape.... why do you post despticble thing about ywhy do you lie about them the health of their families Real "issues" are not discussed nor "debated" in this "forum". Thanks to your fueding with every-damned-body, there very, very little room for actual civil discussion. Thanks a lot. There's an almost unlimited amount of bandwidth here, Brain. Indeed. Mark showed you that. What Mark "showed me" had nothing to do with bandwidth and everything to do with his mental defect, Brain. self denefsen is a mnetal defect ok so you think so Your on-going defense of him shows me (and the rest of the NG) yours. If you need THAT much room, then perhaps you need to pare down your rhetoric a bit. Mark has asked why you need to comment on a person's sexual orientation in an amateur radio newsgroup. He has also asked you to eliminate your comments on people's sexual orientation in an amateur radio newsgroup. He has. And I answered him. no you have not you lied saying that you not bring it iI did not does not answer why you brought it up in the first place His response was to go on the aforementioned tirade. I've asked YOU why you insist on suggesting that others act one way and then do it yourself. becuase he does not you do explain yourself it my job or bb to explain your behavour You've answered with YOUR silence. what was your question? And my "arguments" are pretty well narrowed down to you and your Feeble Five bretheren. I can communicate effectively, if not outright get along with, everyone else here fairly well. Hmmm? Bill Sohl left. Few others are active. Best of luck communicating effectively with "everyone else." You're here. What's YOUR excuse? what exucse does he need Where's YOUR "meaningful debate" or "thoughtful intercourse"...?!?! ghe has particated in every on topic thread int he NG as theycoame with disrupting them as I have I you havebn't indeed you have tried (and many cases suceeded in disputed such threads Where are the answers to questions put ot you YEARS AGO on subjects you thought you'd never be challenged on, yet can't seem to get past...?!?! they will be answered after you answer yours no doubt But then most of the rest of the folks here don't see fit to attack me or to lie in order to get a point across. Perhaps they think you're not worth the trouble. Others are just tired of your nonsense. Perhaps they won the lottery. Perhaps I'm not the only one that they have a "problem" with. prehaps MOST LIKELY is that this NG has accomplished exactly SQUAT, even when there was "meaningful intercourse". perhaps On the otherhand, one of my pieces in this forum was a featured article in Worldradio magazine (for which I was paid a fee, however I returned it uncashed). My comments are routinely quoted in "CQ" magazine. Myself and several other regular posters appear in various "CQ" quotes on a semi-frequent basis. so what? And we have YET to see "N0IMD" in ANY such role. Not even a mention as a "slim" in any DX journal during "Restore Hope". Nor do we see KB9RQZ, N9OGL, Frankie of Silliland nor Lennie the Loser. a lie steve your self complented me on something in CQ VHF You and your "brothers" have yet to master that. There is always your model. Mark has found it very effective. You better redirect credit where credit is due...To your "brother" in California. nope len is not my model you are steve With the lies and innuendo bestowed by you and your bretheren, it's nye-on impossible. Projection. Nope. Not a bit. And what YOU "know" fits in a thimble, and leaves room for seconds. More projection. Nope. Careful obeservation, evaluation, assessment and summation. Steve, K4YZ If you're going to lie about yourself, you might as well make it a big one. And I see you have. See what? (Step away from the mirror and try again, Brain...You're confusing yourself....) npe you are projecting it i quite to claer everyone but you and dave Steve, K4YZ _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
More Markie Mularkie
|
more shit filled trash from steve
K4YZ wrote: wrote: On 15 Jan 2006 07:03:18 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: wrote: There's an almost unlimited amount of bandwidth here, Brain. Indeed. Mark showed you that. What Mark "showed me" had nothing to do with bandwidth and everything to do with his mental defect, Brain. self denefsen is a mnetal defect What's "denefsen"...?!?! Mark has asked why you need to comment on a person's sexual orientation in an amateur radio newsgroup. He has also asked you to eliminate your comments on people's sexual orientation in an amateur radio newsgroup. He has. And I answered him. no you have not Sure I have. nope you have never posted anything about why you brought it concerning me and Todd and Frank |
a lie by steve or just his megalomania either way he trips himself up
On 14 Jan 2006 06:54:04 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote: K4YZ wrote: cut is that you try to lie and deceive in this forum and I won't let you get away with it. You assume that you have control over other people. You do not. But I do. I respond to your comments. You respond in turn. I know that certain comments will elicit certain responses from you. It works. then according to wat you typed there everything I said or done in here is repsonse to waht you wanted and that it was under your control this stament would mean that you have no case a for suit (but we already knew that) and cleary that you want RRAp to exist in the sewer you are in control of us you claimed it, therefore the result are exactly as you wish _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:44 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com