Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 23 May 2006 08:31:29 -0700, "
wrote: This was after I tweaked the PID to get rid of the oscillations but still had some average position errors... I guess with a digital system it would be easier to optimize. Mine was all analog... and only one op amp, so the settings interacted :-) Hi Dan, If anything, going digital has all the prospects of thrashing the antenna into shreds. The oscillations you speak of are eminently suited for an analog solution - you simply have to understand the nature of resonance, coupling (over, critical, and under), and attack. If you don't, translating them into binary code will be impossible. For instance, your average position errors were probably due to under/overshoot and a too heavily dampened system with too much gain. No computer program is going to improve that. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FCC SHUTS DOWN the 'Boy Broadcaster" from ME | General | |||
FCC SHUTS DOWN the 'Boy Broadcaster" from ME | Policy | |||
Hal Turner - the dumbest man on radio - OFF THE AIR! | Shortwave | |||
a page of motorola 2way 2 way portable and mobile radio history | Policy | |||
Tip-of-the-Day: Check your Ham-IV Control Unit | Antenna |