Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael Black wrote:
In that case though, you should be worried about that nearby strong signal dropping the gain of the receiver so you can't hear the weak signal... may be you are not thinking of cw... ![]() Provided the SNR is good enough, you can filter and post-amplify your weak signal, e.g. with a good AF filter, or a dsp. Of course, if the IF stages are (reasonably) linear in response, you can disable the AGC, but this would be no answer to the original question ![]() -- 73 es 51 de i3hev, op. mario Il vero Radioamatore si riconosce... dal call in firma! - Campagna 2005 "Sono un Radioamatore e me ne vanto" it.hobby.radioamatori.moderato http://digilander.libero.it/hamweb http://digilander.libero.it/esperantovenezia |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 19:54:00 +0200, "i3hev, mario held"
wrote: Michael Black wrote: In that case though, you should be worried about that nearby strong signal dropping the gain of the receiver so you can't hear the weak signal... may be you are not thinking of cw... ![]() Provided the SNR is good enough, you can filter and post-amplify your weak signal, e.g. with a good AF filter, or a dsp. Of course, if the IF stages are (reasonably) linear in response, you can disable the AGC, but this would be no answer to the original question ![]() Since the SNR is established by the frontend the IF system can have a more relaxed SNR. However be wary of ICs like the MC1350 as the gain reduction occurs the internal noise is bad. I've built several recievers using this part and at ~10db gain reduction the noise jumps way up. I've gone to cascode JFETs as the noise is more predictable and generally lower. The device used does make a difference. Allison |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 16:33:25 +0200, "i3hev, mario held"
wrote: tim gorman wrote: You might also ask yourself whether it really matters or not. If your signal is strong enough to begin driving the AGC to limit the system gain do you really care what the noise level actually is? .... But you may very well care for the SNR on an interesting weak signal which you are trying to listen to, while a strong nearby signal activates your AGC... ![]() In theory the system bandwidth should not allow that strong signal to hit the AGC. Of course practical systems this may not be true. However, manual gain control helps if the stronger signal is not overloading the front end causing gain compression and intermodulation. Allison |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Regardless of an amplifier's gain, the signal to noise ratio at its
output remains the same as the signal to noise ratio at its input. Obviously - if its a linear amplifier! ---- Reg. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reg Edwards wrote:
Regardless of an amplifier's gain, the signal to noise ratio at its output remains the same as the signal to noise ratio at its input. Obviously - if its a linear amplifier! I'm afraid this is quite wrong ![]() Your statement would be a correct one if and only if the amplifier is a non-noisy one - which, alas, is not a real case... -- 73 es 51 de i3hev, op. mario Il vero Radioamatore si riconosce... dal call in firma! - Campagna 2005 "Sono un Radioamatore e me ne vanto" it.hobby.radioamatori.moderato http://digilander.libero.it/hamweb http://digilander.libero.it/esperantovenezia |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "i3hev, mario held" wrote Reg Edwards wrote: Regardless of an amplifier's gain, the signal to noise ratio at its output remains the same as the signal to noise ratio at its input. Obviously - if its a linear amplifier! I'm afraid this is quite wrong ![]() Your statement would be a correct one if and only if the amplifier is a non-noisy one - which, alas, is not a real case... =================================== If an amplifier incorporates a noise generator or also behaves as a filter, then it is no longer just an amplifier. My statement is quite correct. ---- Reg. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reg Edwards wrote:
If an amplifier incorporates a noise generator... ... then it is no longer just an amplifier. .... .... so, we must conclude that amplifiers do not exist! ![]() of course, there is no real amplifying device which does not generate noise; or, more precisely, there is no non-noisy real device at all ![]() If you choose not to call "amplifier" a device which amplifies signals if it has a non-unity noise figure, please feel free to do so - we live in a (at least partially) free world... but you will be alone! ![]() Regards! -- 73 es 51 de i3hev, op. mario it.hobby.radioamatori.moderato http://digilander.libero.it/hamweb http://digilander.libero.it/esperantovenezia |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Stupid question G5RV | Antenna | |||
transmitter question - its a dousy | Homebrew | |||
transmitter question - its a dousy | Equipment | |||
transmitter question - its a dousy | Homebrew | |||
transmitter question - its a dousy | Equipment |