Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old August 23rd 06, 12:08 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Aug 2006
Posts: 2
Default selecting bias inductors for amps

Hi,

I've been sleceting inductors for chip amplifiers based on the
datasheets, but I would really like to understand what I should be
doing.

If I am designing an amplifer that is to operate over say 3.4 to
4.2GHz, should I be looking for an inductor with self resonance above
that band, or at centre frequency, and why?

(I know that at self resonance, the inductor will be resistive, below
inductive, and above capacitive, but I don't know what I should be
looking for.)

Should I be looking for high Q or low Q, and for what reasons would I
choose each.

What numerical values actually equate to High Q and Low Q?

Is Q of 9 low, and Q of 35 high, for example?

thanks

  #2   Report Post  
Old August 23rd 06, 05:46 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 102
Default selecting bias inductors for amps

wrote in message
ps.com...
If I am designing an amplifer that is to operate over say 3.4 to
4.2GHz, should I be looking for an inductor with self resonance above
that band, or at centre frequency, and why?


The "safe" advice is to choose one where the SRF is above the band you're
designing for, but strictly speaking you can usually get away with SRF within
the band or even a little below.

Your inductor can be modeled as an "ideal" inductor with a capacitor in
parallel. Up until resonance, the reactance of the physical inductor is
positive and varies (roughly) linearly with frequency. At resonance, the
reactance of the capacitor is equal but opposite that of the inductor so you
have Yin = 1/sC + sL = 0 -- an open circuit. Above resonance, the physical
inductor still has positive reactance but now it's decreasing with
frequency... not what you want!

(I know that at self resonance, the inductor will be resistive, below
inductive, and above capacitive, but I don't know what I should be
looking for.)


You're looking for an impedance that's "significantly" (conservately, at least
10x but realistically often 4x is fine -- the more conservative you are, the
less insertion loss you'll get) greater than the characteristic impedance of
your transmission line. (If you run it through a calculator, you'll see that
50 ohms in parallel with, say, j*50*10 is still *very* close to 50 ohms, and
even 50 ohms in parallel with j*4*50 really isn't half bad).

Should I be looking for high Q or low Q, and for what reasons would I
choose each.


About the only upside of a high Q inductor for biasing is slightly lower
insertion loss, and a very significant downside is that the inductor's
resonances above the band you're interested in will be "strong" and can cause
large (1dB), narrow perturbations (resonances) in the system's insertion
loss. A lower Q will tend to "smooth out" those resonances.

Indeed, if you're looking to build a wideband bias circuit, you often use
several inductors in series (small-medium-large, say) *with resistors in
parallel that purpose de-Q the inductors*. Without the de-Qing resistors, the
high-Q inductors have nasty interactions (two or three together will conspire
to appear as something approaching a short circuit at some frequency!)...

What numerical values actually equate to High Q and Low Q?


I'd call "high" Q100 and "low" Q10. High Q inductors are generally not
obtainable in "chip" form; you need air cores or exotic dielectrics to get
such high Q's at VHF/UHF. (For that matter, at least in my mind, high Q
inductors generally shouldn't be used for biasing -- they're used for filters.
:-) )

Is Q of 9 low, and Q of 35 high, for example?


35 is "middle of the road, drifting towards low." Q=35 is a decent inductor
to use for biasing... not too lossy, but lossy enough to avoid the resonance
problems discussed above.

---Joel


  #3   Report Post  
Old August 24th 06, 08:22 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Aug 2006
Posts: 2
Default selecting bias inductors for amps

Hi Joel,

Thanks for a great reply, and good example of why usenet is so good!.

best regards

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CPB Liberal Bias Study Flawed, Critics Say SWLer Shortwave 1 July 7th 05 03:50 AM
Leece Neville value Programbo5 CB 56 January 1st 05 06:46 PM
More media bias George Shortwave 0 September 13th 04 03:00 PM
GS35B bias Ron Homebrew 0 April 12th 04 02:25 AM
Current in antenna loading coils controversy - new measurement Yuri Blanarovich Antenna 69 December 5th 03 02:11 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017