Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tim Wescott" wrote in message
... Yes, you can go the varactor route, and folks have made it work well. But you have to add more components, it'll never be the same, and you'll have to tinker with it to keep it from drifting all over the place. Varactors are not that tough, and don't mistake the "never be the same". Good varactor rigs are much more pleasant than anything with a variable cap. (Although there are plenty of bad varactor designs out there!) Yes, sometimes there are a couple more components, but not many more. It does take some work to get a varactor oscillator close to drift-free, but five minutes with a calculator will get you close enough for SWLing. Oh by the way, getting a capacitor oscillator close to drift free can be a challenge, especially if you don't have hard-to-get air inductors, and microphonics in that case can be a challenge, too. The larger size of the variable cap/air inductor makes mechanical construction details a lot more important. There's really no free lunch. Varactors do have some temperature coefficient, and they are often coupled with toroid inductors, which also have some considerable temperature coefficient. Most of the designs you see out there are for CW rigs in the ham bands, where temperature stability is extremely important. The maze of capacitors around the varactor are there to balance the temperature coefficients. Usually there is a polystyrene capacitor which has a temperature coefficient opposite to the toroid and varactor, but you can never get exactly the right value for that, so it is a question of getting the right combination of positive and negative temperature coefficients AND the right value of capacitance. For AM in the broadcast band, you can probably come close enough with one or two capacitors. For a rig with a 200 Hz CW filter at 15 meters, it can be a real bear keeping the frequency to within the 0.0001% that you need for comfortable operation. That being said, it is undoubtedly easier to use a variable cap, and caps can be cannabalized from old radios easily and cheaply. Leon also mentions the possibility of making a variable inductor. Actually, from time to time articles have appeared about making variable caps, too. In either case, though, you will need considerable mechanical skills. One thing that makes projects hard, especially your first projects, is this idea that you need exactly the right part. With a little help from your trusty calculator, you can play pretty fast and loose with parts values in most projects. In the case of a tuning cap, if you can find something on the right planet it typically isn't too tough to make adjustments to accomodate the different part. Study your circuit and understand what each part is doing, especially around the tuning circuits. It is usually pretty simple to make some adjustments, especially if, as you suggest, getting some precise tuning range isn't critical. ... |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
197 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (23-NOV-04) | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1415 Â September 24, 2004 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1402 Â June 25, 2004 | Policy | |||
214 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (09-APR-04) | Shortwave | |||
209 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (04-APR-04) | Shortwave |