![]() |
Where does the expertise of today's Radio Ham lie?
"deBaser" wrote in message ... "Jim GM4DHJ" wrote in message ... Singing on air Starting silly clubs Buying black boxes Swearing on air Feeling persecuted inventing new ways of spelling inventing new Grammar styles using CB lingo on the former ham bands Are you describing your own condition Jim? Andy no...don't be silly.... |
Where does the expertise of today's Radio Ham lie?
On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 12:40:48 +0100, Aspiring _REAL_ Radio Ham wrote:
I feel that I must apologise for the crocodile of immature and abusive children who dog my every effort on Usenet, and in particular who have tried to reduce this thread to an issuance from the cess-pit. I have been on Usenet since 1994. In that time I have contributed many articles on my stance towards maintaining the technical and gentlemanly traditions of Ham Radio. For my pains I have picked up a series of unpleasant individuals (who illustrate very well the unacceptable decline in standards?) who resort to the most grossly offensive and gratuitously insulting outbursts unrelated to anything that I have ever said or done. I have _NEVER_ originated any personal attacks on anybody. I am, however, only human, and have replied on occasion, but only in defensive indignance. I have _NEVER_ published any articles intended to annoy people or to provoke them. Everything that I have published has been a sincere expression of my stance on a number of areas, liberalism, republicanism, pacifism, poetry, atheism, anti-plod violence, Ham Radio. I have never claimed to be omniscient; indeed, when there have areas in which I have been unable to understand things, I have posted queries. I have on several occasions chastised those who use an international forum such as Usenet to publish infantile insulting tirades. I shall continue to do so. I started to respond to your "FAQ" and then changed my mind, but your persistence compels me to respond. I too have been using the 'net for a considerable time, and FidoNet before that. Thirty-some odd years ago I became interested in becoming a "ham". Several years earlier I had built my first receiver and became interested in electricity at an age when most kids are still trying to get their heads around "See Spot run." I met an old ham who gave me stacks of "CQ" magazine and ARRL handbooks, most of which I read cover to cover. But, things change and I didn't get my ticket. Eventually I wound up in the Army, working on radar systems (among other things). I am technically inclined and currently work with computer hardware. I never lost interest in radio and have always been involved, one way or another. Over the last few years I again entertained thoughts about getting my ticket. But, things seem to have changed...and not necessarilly for the better. It seems to me that qualifications have been relaxed. Is this an attempt to increase participation in an area with declining interest? I don't know. But I do know a few current hams, and I started reading the rec.radio.amateur.homebrew newsgroup, going back to Dec. of 2005. I am sure that there are still many helpful hams who are good people to know, I've read a number of them in this particular group. Unfortunately, there seems to also be an increasing number of people whose attitudes are repellant...including yours. You rant about "childish insults", and immediately proceed to insult others in the same manner. You have *your* opinion of what "ham radio" is (or ought to be), and you announce that you are going to jam it down everyone's throats whether they like it or not. Frankly, I really don't see a whole lot of difference between your behaviour and that of some of those dislikeable individuals on the 11 meter band (which you denigrate as a whole with your repeated remarks about "Childish Broadcasters"). In fact, your insistence that your "FAQ" "will not be shouted down" reminds me very much of the individuals who lock down the key and proclaim "Nobody is going to talk over me" and proceed to repeat a bunch of gibberish which serves only to restrict and interfere with civilized conversation. Though I tend not to participate in the nonsense which occurs in the "normal" portion of 11 meters there are some good people there, as there are in other areas of the spectrum and with whom I communicate. And, despite your assertion to the contrary, there are many of us in and outside of 11 meters who are interested in how radios work, and who build/modify and operate our own equipment. You also assert that "A Ham Radio licence is such a desirable thing to have...". If it is so "desireable", then why are the standards being relaxed so as to lower the barrier to entry? In your own "FAQ" you you say that the standards are now "trivial" and "set for six-year-olds". What other reason for this could there be besides a declining level of interest? they are free with rather silly personal insults. Pot? Kettle? Black? One infallible way to disambiguate the CB Radio Hobbyist from the _REAL_ Radio Ham is to solicit their view of the difference between CB Radio and Ham Radio. A Radio Ham will perceive Ham Radio to be a technical pursuit and will perceive CB Radio to be a social communications facility What makes you think that *your* opinion is the only valid opinion? Or, indeed, that it is valid at all? Strictly a technical pursuit? Surely you jest. Even in the past when technical knowledge and code skills were of greater importance, even "ham" radio was a "social communications facility". The fact that much of the communication may have been technical in nature in no way lessens the "social communication" aspect. There is not today, nor has there ever been, a need to go out and encourage and press children, children who have never expressed an interest in Ham Radio, to come into our shacks. Such an activity should cause eyebrows to be raised - what normal well-adjusted adults seek the social acquaintance of children?! What? I'm not even sure how to respond to *this*, except to say that were it not for adults introducing me to various technical pursuits and encouraging me to get involved, and teaching me, I would not have accomplished a fraction of the things I have done over the years. Please remember that this FAQ is a _POSITIVE EXHORTATION_ to you to exert yourselves to join our fraternity! If that is your intent, I think you are falling far short of the mark. In fact, you have reduced my interest in obtaining an amateur license practically to zero. Was it Groucho Marx that said "I wouldn't be a member of any club that would have me"? I think I'll take a "pass" on joining *your* "fraternity". You've even got me to thinking that maybe the government(s) should stop wasting money on regulating the amateur bands, open them up to anyone who cares to operate on them, without restrictions, and abandon them them, much as they have done with the "CB" band in the US. I'll continue to operate my radios but I see little point in expending the effort to get a ham ticket just to encounter the same sort of people that I can run into on 11 meters with no effort at all. Say, how are you doing with that question of which end of a resistor is which? When you get that worked out, perhaps you'd care to comment on the feasibility of using a tuneable Klystron oscillator to drive a magnetron in a high-power pulsed RF application. |
Where does the expertise of today's Radio Ham lie?
huLLy wrote: G1LVN wrote: Bowman wrote: "Aspiring _REAL_ Radio Ham" wrote in message ... I have _NEVER_ published any articles intended to annoy people or to provoke them. Accusing me by name in a post subject line of cancelling his amateur radio licence on-line.... Always wondered who that was ;) I rather think it might have been G8DXY ;-) |
Where does the expertise of today's Radio Ham lie?
G1LVN wrote:
I rather think it might have been G8DXY ;-) Let's face it, it could have been any of the 3000 posters that have been Beaned -- huLLy Tel: 07976 123278 villageidiot(at)sheepandmeths.co.uk ICQ 136-987-925 |
Where does the expertise of today's Radio Ham lie?
huLLy wrote: G1LVN wrote: I rather think it might have been G8DXY ;-) Let's face it, it could have been any of the 3000 posters that have been Beaned -- huLLy Tel: 07976 123278 villageidiot(at)sheepandmeths.co.uk ICQ 136-987-925 not really, only G8DXY would have access to the Ref number on Beanies Validation Document. |
Where does the expertise of today's Radio Ham lie?
Aspiring _REAL_ Radio Ham wrote:
Shame on you all. You do nothing for the PR of Ham Radio. Yes, none of you have tried shouting CQ through the bars of a cell with a blanket on your head. I made lots of contacts, mostly boots to the head and handcuff marks to the wrists. 73's G4SDW |
Where does the expertise of today's Radio Ham lie?
A real QRPer would have used 2 blankets :-)
"Gareth Alun Evans" wrote in message ... Yes, none of you have tried shouting CQ through the bars of a cell with a blanket on your head. |
Where does the expertise of today's Radio Ham lie?
"Gareth Alun Evans" wrote in message
... Aspiring _REAL_ Radio Ham wrote: Shame on you all. You do nothing for the PR of Ham Radio. Yes, none of you have tried shouting CQ through the bars of a cell with a blanket on your head. I made lots of contacts, mostly boots to the head and handcuff marks to the wrists. 73's G4SDW ROTFLMAO |
Where does the expertise of today's Radio Ham lie?
BOB (Bog Off Beanie) wrote: ROTFLMAO This aioe.org server seems to be doing overtime in this ng :-) |
Where does the expertise of today's Radio Ham lie?
Mike Gathergood (G4KFK) wrote:
BOB (Bog Off Beanie) wrote: ROTFLMAO This aioe.org server seems to be doing overtime in this ng :-) That is a very Cheap ******* (CB) point - you know I don't work! |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:47 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com