Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Henry Kiefer wrote: Efficient antennas at that frequency are effectively very long bits of wire. The ferrite rod is small compared to the wavelength and very inefficient at generating a far field. This is the antenna of the DCF77 transmitter (same frequency): http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bild ![]() OK Iwo. But why a small receiving ferrite antenna works here? A non-saturated (=linear, and that means the superposition theorem works) antenna system is reciprocal as antenna theory predicts. So you should explain where the difference is! At LF, rarely is the problem "not enough amplitude of received signal", so past a certain point there isn't much need to make the receiver antenna more efficient. The problem is always "too much noise!". So antenna designs are usually built around nulling out local noise, and loop antennas will get rid of the mostly electric-field local noise. And they have some directionality (notably sharp nulls) which can help get rid of specific further-away noise. Tim. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Loop Antennas / minijack works-clips don't / impedence?? | Shortwave | |||
WHY - The simple Random Wire Antenna is better than the Dipole Antenna for the Shortwave Listener (SWL) | Shortwave | |||
OLD motorola trunking information | Scanner | |||
Question for better antenna mavens than I | Shortwave |