LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #5   Report Post  
Old October 28th 06, 08:24 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 21
Default More on matching -- Xtal filters this time


"AndyS" wrote in message
oups.com...

William E. Sabin wrote:
"AndyS" andysharpe@
A large increase in a receiver amplifier load impedance just outside the
passband of a crystal filter (or other types of filter) can cause
adjacent
channel susceptibility. The network between the amplifier and the filter
should be designed to prevent this occurrence. There are networks that
can
reverse this effect, so the impedance drops instead of increasing.
Simulations and impedance measurements can verify.

Bill W0IYH


Andy comments:

A good point. But I am not aware of any passive networks than
can roll the impedance off ( or bring it up) fast enough to handle
the adjacent channel problem. Adjacent channels are usually
(in my experience) only a few Khz away while the xtal filter is
usually many Mhz, and a passive network just doesn't change
the impedance that quickly. For those problems, I have always
had to go to a passive resistor source, such as a collector resistor,
or use a coil with a Q low enough to provide the same effect.

If I am incorrect in this, could you please elaborate on what
passive matching circuit you are reccommending. ?

Andy W4OAH


If you have the July 1970 QST there is an article starting on page 35 that
discusses this situation. The load impedance at the drain of the JFET
amplifier increased very rapidly just outside the passband of the xtal
filter as shown in Fig 8. The network in Fig 9A inverts the impedance change
as shown in Fig 9B. This approach was tested for this article. Pages 39 and
40 show the text that applies to this situation. I have confirmed this
approach a few times since then. However, if a fixed resistor is used to
load the drain of the JFET this effect is pretty well mitigated. A large
increase in the load impedance that the amplifier transistor sees can cause
the JFET drain to become overloaded just outside the passband, and I
confirmed this in a homebrew receiver that used a particular xtal filter.
Different filter design approaches (xtal filter black magic) might produce
results somewhat different than mine, so the problem and the solution always
need to be verified experimentally. In general the gain of the JFET etc.
must be restricted so that drain overload is avoided at all frequencies, as
the article explains. Also, if you have the 2004 ARRL Handbook, page 17.5
column one mentions a similar problem that can occur.

Bill W0IYH




 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
You'll probably never have to use CW to save a life. Slow Code Policy 189 December 14th 06 10:46 AM
The Shortwave Antenna used determines the type of Matching Transformer RHF Shortwave 13 May 14th 06 10:50 PM
North-Central Florida Mil Logs 2/23/2005 GeorgeF Scanner 0 February 24th 05 12:43 AM
North-Central Florida Mil Logs 8/10/2004 GeorgeF Scanner 0 August 11th 04 02:12 PM
Socal listening Jamie Corridon Shortwave 6 July 22nd 03 05:10 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017