Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
A different view of the code test option
Andy writes
Well, I've read the posts here, as well as the vitriol being thrown around, and it's obvious that a lot of people have strong opinions about the usefulness of the code test. As a pragmatist , here is MY two cents worth. 1) No-code operators won't be on the CW bands, so those of us that us CW won't even know they are around. 2) Most, if not damn near ALL equipment being put on the air now are appliances bought in the store what have been type accepted. Consequently, no degradation of technical standards will occur, as MOST of the equipment are designed by professionals anyway, and I doubt that many no-code operators will try to build their own. 3) Those FEW, like myself, who build their own equipment know lthere is NO correlation between knowing Morse Code and the technical design of a radio. We learned Morse because we had to, and either learned to love it or promptly forgot it as we designed our SSB and FM radios for the next several decades..... 4) Finally, the ONLY concern I have is that portions of the CW bands may eventually be taken away and given to the appliance operators. If interest in the CW bands dwindles, that's probably just an evolutionary step... However, having CW as a requirement will NOT make newbies want to use it when they can just talk into a microphone and jabber away. It's a new breed of internet-savy operators, and already the newsgroups ( like THIS ONE) are attracting far more people who like to talk with strangers than an expensive appliance that interferes with the wife's TV programs .... I'm afraid ham radio is dwindling, but it will be around for the rest of my lifetime, and that's OK ..... That's how I see it. Having a code requirement is simply an obstacle to hurdle in getting a license. It may as well be required for a driver's license for all the "technical" good it does. On the other hand, it does give us Extras a sort of "elite" status for having earned it.... I'm glad to have the ability to have Morse Code, typing, memorization of the color codes, and good looks on my resume.... Andy W4OAH in Eureka , Texas |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
A different view of the code test option
Please folks, do not reply to these off topic posts.
If these idiots never get any replies, they will eventually give up and go away. Thanks, Bill, W6WRT |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
A different view of the code test option
Bill Turner wrote: Please folks, do not reply to these off topic posts. If these idiots never get any replies, they will eventually give up and go away. Thanks, Bill, W6WRT Andy writes: I agree with Bill W6WRT. Since I have seen so many postings about this on this newsgroup, I just ASSUMED that folks here wanted to talk about it..... I did a "reply" using "google" to one of the other posts, and found that it was multiply cross posted to a LOT of groups, meaning that somebody just wanted to make a fuss...... TROLLING..... I apologize to Bill, and everyone else here, for not looking more closely at the subject before posting to rec.radio.amateur.homebrew I can't say it won't happen again, ever, but I'll try to watch it in the future, and would ENCOURAGE anyone who just hits a "reply" button to check to see if it is being crossposted.... If it is, please go to the group that is interested in it and don't plague the newsgroups with spam....... as Bill and I have just done (grin).. Andy W4OAH |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
A different view of the code test option
"AndyS" ) writes:
Andy writes Well, I've read the posts here, as well as the vitriol being thrown around, No, the posts aren't here, they are cross-posted by idiots who think whatever it is they have to say is so important that they need to spew it across the newsgroups. If you really wanted to address the issue, then you go elsewhere to post, where such posts belong. At the very least, and you should always think twice about it, you reply to the cross-posted junk rather than start a new thread that is only in rec.radio.amateur.homebrew YOu can even reply to those existing threads and take out the irrelevant newsgroups, such as this one. For most of a decade (and likely before) we've been relatively isolated, as if the people who do all that cross-posting don't think that building radio equipment is actually part of the hobby. But their need to spread their junk has meant don't keep it in rec.radio.amateur.policy where it belongs, they don't even keep it there and in rec.radio.amateur.misc where it was often kept until relatively, they spew to all kinds of newsgroups as they catch on that there are other ones. So they spew into rec.radio.shortwave, and the spew into the more technical newsgroups like this one and rec.radio.amateur.antenna LIke Bill Turner said, don't reply to them. But that doesn't mean starting the arguments here in standalone threads, either. Michael VE2BVW |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
A different view of the code test option
On 11 Dec 2006 07:36:51 -0800, AndyS wrote:
Bill Turner wrote: Please folks, do not reply to these off topic posts. If these idiots never get any replies, they will eventually give up and go away. Bill, W6WRT Andy writes: I agree with Bill W6WRT. If everybody would just take step one: Killfile postings from Google. The OP: Message-ID: .com Each posting that Bill has commented on in the rec.radio.amateur.* ng's was ooze emanating from Google. Jonesy -- never seeing Google posts, but forced to wade past the followups. -- Marvin L Jones | jonz | W3DHJ | linux 38.24N 104.55W | @ config.com | Jonesy | OS/2 *** Killfiling google posts: http//jonz.net/ng.htm |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
A different view of the code test option
"AndyS" wrote in
oups.com: Bill Turner wrote: Please folks, do not reply to these off topic posts. If these idiots never get any replies, they will eventually give up and go away. Thanks, Bill, W6WRT Andy writes: I agree with Bill W6WRT. Since I have seen so many postings about this on this newsgroup, I just ASSUMED that folks here wanted to talk about it..... Andy, Welcome to the group. A lot of people here want to talk about it and find your point of view on CW interesting reading. Just ignore Bill Turdner. Don't let his insults bother you, he likes to act like an asshole sometimes. If the ship he was on was sinking he wouldn't know about it until he was drowning. As far as your view that CW is just a hurdle to getting a license, I vote for keeping the hurdle. At least when they get licensed they have a skill then. To many of them just want to get a license and talk on a microphone. Any CB'er can to that. SC |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
A different view of the code test option
Bill Turner wrote in
: Please folks, do not reply to these off topic posts. If these idiots never get any replies, they will eventually give up and go away. Good heavens, Bill! I appreciate the sentiment, but you do realize that you've become just another disruptive poster on the newsgroups. I don't see the jerks, but I do see your posts to them. Someone is always trying to "Clean up Dodge City", and they always fail. Give it a break, and excercise your filters! - 73 de Mike KB3EIA - |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
You'll probably never have to use CW to save a life. | Policy | |||
another place the fruit can't post | Policy | |||
Is the code requirement really keeping good people out of ham radio? | Scanner | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | General |