Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Joseph H Allen wrote: In article .com, K7ITM wrote: Finally, can you think of a way to alter the amplifier's input impedance in a way that does not degrade noise, so that you come closer to an impedance match while maintaining a match for optimal noise? Negative feedback increased input impedance. It looks like lossless negative feedback will do this without also increasing the noise. Perhaps use this to make the input impedance equal the noise-opt impedance- then you can match the two together to the source (using a transformer or a tuned circuit). .... Right. Well, actually, you can use negative feedback to either increase or decrease the input impedance, and to either increase or decrease the output impedance. Negative feedback applied as a current into a summing junction (as in an inverting op amp circuit) decreases the input impedance. Negative feedback applied as a voltage in series with the input signal (as in a non-inverting op amp circuit, or by using a source/emitter impedance) increases the input impedance. Feedback derived from the output voltage decreases the output impedance (tries to hold the output voltage constant, for a constant input signal). Feedback derived from the output current increases the output impedance (tries to hold the output current constant, for a constant input signal). Just as you say, though, feedback can be difficult to apply at RF, and especially so at the very high frequencies where noise figure is typically the most critical. Cheers, Tom |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Tandem Match | Homebrew | |||
please need help with delta loop antenna better matching system than gamma match | Antenna | |||
Clemens match modelling | Antenna | |||
Gamma match question 6-meter yagi | Antenna | |||
Gamma match: Inherently inferior to balanced match systems? | Antenna |