Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21   Report Post  
Old January 26th 07, 04:55 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 120
Default Where does part 97 end and part 15 begin?

John Smith I wrote:
John Smith I wrote:

John Smith I wrote:

Anyway, I would pursue this much differently.

Indian reservations are exempt from MANY of the rules, regulations and
laws the rest of us non-indigenous peoples are subject too.

I'd see if the above were not a factor in all this.

JS



Just think! Instead of the Indians having a monopoly on all gambling in
California (yes, I know, it is really vegas using the Indians), they
could now go ahead and get a monopoly on all broadcasting!

JS


Myself and a colleague discussed the number of permits and variances
needed to launch real, orbital-type rockets and wondered how much would
be required if you launched from a Native reservation.
  #22   Report Post  
Old January 26th 07, 06:14 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 74
Default Where does part 97 end and part 15 begin?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In . com writes:

All,


I have a situation, and would like some opinions rather than flames on
how to handle it. My wife teaches at a public school just off the
Easter Arizona Navajo reservation. Lately, a junior school science
teacher is starting up a science club and has asked me to provide for
the amateur radio side of the club and be its control operator.


[...]

What I want to do is provide each kid with a popcorn CW transceiver for
the colorburst frequency (3579 khz), a key, a short random wire, and a
battery. That way they could practice amongst themselves with
myself as occasional net control.


[...]

My question is this: so long as final output to the antenna is within
the requirement of part 15 unlicensed operation, is part 15 unlicensed
operation allowed within a band normally governed under part 97?
Part 15 operation would easily cover a 30 mile radius on 80M.


If no, I'll run the net under part 15 on the edge of the AM band near
160M.


Thanks in advance,


The Eternal Squire


I think this is an excellent, and well-intentioned, idea in principle.
Others here have given good advice about being careful about power
levels. The Technical Information Service (TIS) at the American Radio
Relay League (ARRL) has put together a very comprehensive and
informative web page relating to Part 15. It's particularly helpful in
explaining about how Part 15 fits in with Part 97. It can be found at:

http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/part15.html

Especially note the "Myths" and "Scope" links at the above site.

- --
73, Paul W. Schleck, K3FU

http://www.novia.net/~pschleck/
Finger for PGP Public Key

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (SunOS)

iD8DBQFFujAz6Pj0az779o4RAsCLAJ9XlNAFNW+QlZ0VDDK6UE B/V6E/mgCfV9xq
w9Pir5leWIFOmGTRZfj/vGM=
=cIeL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


  #23   Report Post  
Old January 26th 07, 06:37 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,154
Default Where does part 97 end and part 15 begin?

Paul W. Schleck wrote:

...


I certainly hope Paul is an attorney, as if he speaks about the
reservation, I hope he speaks with knowledge.

Here is a paper which will demonstrate there is "quite a bit of
controversy" over legality of 97 and 15 on reservations:

http://www.fcc.gov/sptf/files/0801fcc.pdf

Course, with some, an amateur license immediately makes them an
authority in all areas ...

Warmest regards,
JS

  #24   Report Post  
Old January 26th 07, 07:35 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2006
Posts: 134
Default Where does part 97 end and part 15 begin?

wrote in message
ups.com...
All,

I have a situation, and would like some opinions rather than flames on
how to handle it. My wife teaches at a public school just off the
Eastern Arizona Navajo reservation. Lately, a junior school science
teacher is starting up a science club and has asked me to provide for
the amateur radio side of the club and be its control operator.

She believes that the kids would be fascinated by the Morse code -
DXing - Construction end of the hobby, even though Morse is no longer a
required test element.

The kids are mostly Navajo and thusly have a very limited technological
background (hence the reason for the club to stir the interest), so I
need something concrete with immediate payoff to keep their interest
hooked while getting them as ready as I can to write their Technician
exam. The nearest VEC is 4 hours away and I'd rather have as few fail
as possible.


The Navajo people have a proud heritage for their WW2 participation in usage
of their language for communication in the Pacific (Japanese could not break
it). See movie - Windtalkers (and a couple of others).

CW may be of interest to some - in that it is also a human translated
code --
that was a foreign to 19th century US citizens -- as Arabic is to many 21st
century Americans today.

You should contact the VEC to see what accommodations they could make -- to
assist you for testing. Good luck with it.

w9gb


  #25   Report Post  
Old January 26th 07, 11:22 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 618
Default Where does part 97 end and part 15 begin?


wrote in message
oups.com...
I'm a bit more worried about having them memorize the Clapp, Colpitts,
and Pierce
Oscillators. Isn't that stuff still on Tech exam?

The Eternal Squire


Nope. It's not on either the Tech or General exams. It does show up on the
Extra exam. Even at that a person might or might not get that question on
their particular exam. Take a look at the Tech test pool on the ARRL set.
You will see that it just covers basic stuff.

Dee, N8UZE




  #26   Report Post  
Old January 27th 07, 05:38 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 74
Default Where does part 97 end and part 15 begin?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In John Smith I writes:

Paul W. Schleck wrote:


...


I certainly hope Paul is an attorney, as if he speaks about the
reservation, I hope he speaks with knowledge.


I am not a lawyer. When faced with legal questions about my own
operation, or when trying to help keep apparently honest and sincere
people like "Eternal Squire" stay out of trouble, I defer to the true
experts. Existing, compiled, and expert advice like that provided at
the ARRL TIS site I previously mentioned would seem to be a good place
to start. I also value the insight provided here by Usenet participants
who are attorneys with experience in communications law. I would
certainly defer to their input on this matter, if offered (*).

I also ask myself if I am obeying the spirit as well as the letter of
any law or regulation. I don't feel it's within the scope of good
amateur practice, personal ethical conduct, or even just overall "good
neighbor" guidelines to be focusing on alleged loopholes such as being
on a Native American Reservation, in international waters, or an
"educational project." Often such excuses are transparent,
self-serving, and not borne out in actual legal practice, regulations,
treaties, enforcement, etc. Unless I had a lot of legal resources at my
disposal (pro bono counsel, etc.), I would probably not seek to try and
make myself a legal test case, as some on the newsgroups seem bent on
doing.

I would hope that "Eternal Squire", whose post implies that he is a
licensed radio amateur, is thinking along these same lines, also. I
offered my layperson's advice in that context.

Here is a paper which will demonstrate there is "quite a bit of
controversy" over legality of 97 and 15 on reservations:


http://www.fcc.gov/sptf/files/0801fcc.pdf


I read the above transcript you provided. I note with interest that my
friend, fellow ham, and Usenet peer Carl Stevenson (WK3C) was a member
of this workshop. I'd certainly defer to his technical expertise.
However, the gist I got from the transcript, and from asking legal
experts, is that case law is mixed on the subject of whether what
happens on a reservation is strictly an internal, tribal matter. That
no one present at the workshop wanted to venture an authoritative answer
doesn't meant that there aren't those involved in enforcement who could
give one. Radio transmitters and casinos are given as principal
examples where case law, practice, and jurisdictional agreements go
against the assertion that on a reservation, U.S. law does not apply.

Course, with some, an amateur license immediately makes them an
authority in all areas ...


It was a question about amateur radio, asked in an amateur radio
newsgroup. I suggested that he seek expert advice, such as that
summarized at the ARRL TIS web site I linked previously. No more, and
no less.

Warmest regards,
JS


(*) I did ask one of the experts in communications law that I know
personally. He offered the following observations:

"I would add something to the extent that you have been advised
by a communications attorney with over 50 years' experience in
FCC regulatory matters that unless there is a specific treaty
granting a tribe authority to regulate amateur radio
transmissions on a reservation, and there isn't, FCC law and
jurisdiction prevail. There are agreements giving tribes
authority to determine who may operate a broadcast station
from a reservation, but the FCC must regulate the technical
parameters (frequency, power, location) to be observed and
grant the callsign and make all necessary international
notifications.

Similarly, in international waters or airspace, the country of
registration of the vessel or aircraft retains jurisdiction,
and any country may lodge a complaint of violation of the
International Radio Regulations with the country of registration
if that is the case. If the vessel or aircraft is 'unregistered',
any country has the authority to blast it out of the water or the
air, although that is a drastic measure. The International
Radio Regulations do, however. oblige all countries to not
condone or support any radio (or TV) broadcasting from
international waters or airspace."

As this seems to be drifting into a *.policy area, and not *.homebrew,
I've set followups as appropriate. Feel free to override my default if
you must.

- --
Paul W. Schleck, K3FU

http://www.novia.net/~pschleck/
Finger for PGP Public Key

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (SunOS)

iD8DBQFFuuMd6Pj0az779o4RAidgAJ4tmvrsIgefuGREQz/Eqw20LljowACfRg1f
glmhM6RbiJJcbgT3quj9GmM=
=Dai7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


  #27   Report Post  
Old January 27th 07, 06:00 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,154
Default Where does part 97 end and part 15 begin?

Paul W. Schleck wrote:

...


Well, I must admit, anyone affiliated with the ARRL turns me off, as it
does many. Although they cannot, possibly, be held directly and solely
responsible for bringing amateur radio to the brink of disaster it now
hangs at, they certainly have never helped much, well, other than
themselves.

However, I would strongly suggest anyone to investigate all of the
options open to an Indian reservation, the laws which govern them are
much different than those governing all other areas of the USA. If I
read that paper correctly (mentioned in my earlier post), the FCC would
seem to be mostly interested in the rf which left the borders of the
reservation.

I know ripples of shock went through the population of California when
they were allowed to operate gambling casinos. Something most did not
expect.

I would not be surprised if further surprises along those same line do
not await us ...

Now, as to the rest, I am simply not impressed nor interested ...

Regards,
JS
  #28   Report Post  
Old January 27th 07, 05:25 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,154
Default Where does part 97 end and part 15 begin?

Jim Higgins wrote:

...
If you read that paper correctly all you saw was a few casual remarks
on a topic that was dropped as fast as it arose and was never at any
time addressed seriously in that document. To infer anything from
what was said is, IMHO, foolish at best.


As I remember, gambling on reservations had almost that/those humble
beginnings ...

It is clear, in my personal opinion, the FCC would have NO interest in
rf levels on the reservation, and ONLY those leaving the borders of the
reservation would EVER come into question ...

Regards,
JS
  #29   Report Post  
Old January 27th 07, 05:55 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,898
Default Where does part 97 end and part 15 begin?

John Smith I wrote:
Jim Higgins wrote:


...
If you read that paper correctly all you saw was a few casual remarks
on a topic that was dropped as fast as it arose and was never at any
time addressed seriously in that document. To infer anything from
what was said is, IMHO, foolish at best.


As I remember, gambling on reservations had almost that/those humble
beginnings ...


It is clear, in my personal opinion, the FCC would have NO interest in
rf levels on the reservation, and ONLY those leaving the borders of the
reservation would EVER come into question ...


People living on the reservation have all the consumer electronics that
can be interfered with that people living off the reservation have.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.
  #30   Report Post  
Old January 27th 07, 06:05 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,154
Default Where does part 97 end and part 15 begin?

John Smith I wrote:
Jim Higgins wrote:

...
If you read that paper correctly all you saw was a few casual remarks
on a topic that was dropped as fast as it arose and was never at any
time addressed seriously in that document. To infer anything from
what was said is, IMHO, foolish at best.


As I remember, gambling on reservations had almost that/those humble
beginnings ...

It is clear, in my personal opinion, the FCC would have NO interest in
rf levels on the reservation, and ONLY those leaving the borders of the
reservation would EVER come into question ...

Regards,
JS


Jim:

Let me go a bit further on this. I happen to have a sister who works
for Child Protective Services in California (CPS.)

If you are Indian (even part) and CPS pays you a visit, and you ARE
Indian, they must immediately back down and defer to the Indian Council
on the reservation/tribe which the person in question is a member of ...
that individual is NOT subject to the same laws you or I would be.

Let me go a bit further:
If you are Indian, the welfare agency will provide "different" benefits
to you than some others. Indeed, the Washoe Tribe of California and
Nevada "chip in" and provide you with "expanded" benefits and medical
assistance.

The above was/were gleaned though discussions with my sister over time
.... anyone interested can investigate for themselves. I am intrigued by
the fact the Indians care for their own so well; I would be interested
in knowing more.

Regards,
JS
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017