Jim Higgins wrote:

...
If you read that paper correctly all you saw was a few casual remarks
on a topic that was dropped as fast as it arose and was never at any
time addressed seriously in that document. To infer anything from
what was said is, IMHO, foolish at best.

As I remember, gambling on reservations had almost that/those humble
beginnings ...

It is clear, in my personal opinion, the FCC would have NO interest in
rf levels on the reservation, and ONLY those leaving the borders of the
reservation would EVER come into question ...

Regards,
JS

John Smith I wrote:
Jim Higgins wrote:

...
If you read that paper correctly all you saw was a few casual remarks
on a topic that was dropped as fast as it arose and was never at any
time addressed seriously in that document. To infer anything from
what was said is, IMHO, foolish at best.

As I remember, gambling on reservations had almost that/those humble
beginnings ...

It is clear, in my personal opinion, the FCC would have NO interest in
rf levels on the reservation, and ONLY those leaving the borders of the
reservation would EVER come into question ...

People living on the reservation have all the consumer electronics that
can be interfered with that people living off the reservation have.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

wrote:

...
People living on the reservation have all the consumer electronics that
can be interfered with that people living off the reservation have.


Jim:

Most likely equal or better!

Those Indians living on the reservation in Amador County receive approx.
$5000.00 per month/per individual.

A family of three would get about $15,000 a month from the proceeds of
the casino, if they actually work in the casino, more ... they don't pay
taxes on their cigarettes either!

That just ain't bad, and leaves a couple of bucks left over to purchase
hobby items ... some drive nice Hummers, I have noticed ...

Regards,
JS

John Smith I wrote:
Jim Higgins wrote:

...
If you read that paper correctly all you saw was a few casual remarks
on a topic that was dropped as fast as it arose and was never at any
time addressed seriously in that document. To infer anything from
what was said is, IMHO, foolish at best.

As I remember, gambling on reservations had almost that/those humble
beginnings ...

It is clear, in my personal opinion, the FCC would have NO interest in
rf levels on the reservation, and ONLY those leaving the borders of the
reservation would EVER come into question ...

Regards,
JS

Jim:

Let me go a bit further on this. I happen to have a sister who works
for Child Protective Services in California (CPS.)

If you are Indian (even part) and CPS pays you a visit, and you ARE
Indian, they must immediately back down and defer to the Indian Council
on the reservation/tribe which the person in question is a member of ...
that individual is NOT subject to the same laws you or I would be.

Let me go a bit further:
If you are Indian, the welfare agency will provide "different" benefits
to you than some others. Indeed, the Washoe Tribe of California and
Nevada "chip in" and provide you with "expanded" benefits and medical
assistance.

The above was/were gleaned though discussions with my sister over time
.... anyone interested can investigate for themselves. I am intrigued by
the fact the Indians care for their own so well; I would be interested
in knowing more.

Regards,
JS