Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 1, 4:11�am, "Dave" wrote:
*I am new enough at winding toroids that I am probably going t use the bifilar winding technique, which seems like it might be more forgiving if I need to make adjustments afterward (correct me if I'm wrong.) *But I understand what you are saying here, and appreciate your input. *Thanks much. Once I get more adept this is what I will do. Here's a suggestion that's an old one when I first tried it (successfully) 30 years ago on multi-filar windings: Get an old hand-operated drill (electric if it has slow speed), lay out equal lengths of magnet wire, tape one end of the bundle securely, chuck the other end in the drill and do the twisting. Pause several times while doing so to make sure there aren't any sharp twists along the way, "iron" those out with fingers. You can get an idea of the number of twists per inch (or meter or whatever) as you pause...for wideband RF transformers the number of twists per unit length need only be approximate. What you wind up with (no pun intended) is the equivalent of multi-wire balanced transmission lines of relatively low impedance and the total length would be roughly a quarter-wavelength at the highest frequency of such a transformer. However, if you are doing a tap for a lower-impedance point such as an oscillator feedback or impedance in/out, the physical tap position doesn't have to be precise or absolute (lots of other factors will be involved there). Just get as close as you can to published data/article on tap position and you'll be okay. Winding toroids may be new to lots of folks but all it takes is more patience than with old-style cylindrical forms. I might add that, once a circuit is working with a toroid, it can be secured by using some petroleum-based varnish lightly brushed over it. Most "boat" or "spar" varnish types are good for that but one is stuck with having to buy quart cans of it (rather expensive). The reason I mention marine varnish is that it stands up to moisture in the air. If you use "Q Dope" (liquid form polystyrene) it looks very nice when done but a year from now the moisture normally in room air can "lift" it from non-porous surfaces. On testing with MF to UHF Q Meters, there is no more degredation of Q using varnish than with liquid polystyrene or lacquers. I use the McCloskey brand "Gym-Seal" varnish because that is also good for wood surfaces around the house; it was originally formulated as a surface varnish for gymnasium floors and the like. Takes at least an over-night drying time with a complete cure in two days. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Question about 20-meter monoband vertical (kinda long - antenna gurus welcome) | Antenna | |||
A QRZ Trivia Question That Smegma Radio May Find Educational | Antenna | |||
A QRZ Trivia Question That Smegma Radio May Find Educational | Homebrew | |||
A QRZ Trivia Question That Smegma Radio May Find Educational | General | |||
New odd question | Antenna |