"Cheemag" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 15:12:08 -0400, "Dee Flint"
wrote:

I doubt he could get it past the moderators. It is derogatory towards
both
hams and CB operators.

And your description of CB-ers as "operators" is derogatory
towards amateur radio operators.

--

73, Jim, G4RGA

Only in your mind since you choose to view it that way. There are many fine
CB operators. However the service has been trashed by the noticeable few.
All must then suffer the insults engendered by the few.

Dee, N8UZE

"Walt Davidson" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 18:04:17 -0400, "Dee Flint"
wrote:

There are many fine
CB operators. However the service has been trashed by the noticeable few.
All must then suffer the insults engendered by the few.

Indeed they must.

So what is your complaint?

73 de G3NYY

--
Walt Davidson Email: g3nyy @despammed.com

I'll have to ask you to read the entire thread for yourself. I've no reason
or need to repeat everything. However my complaint was that the original
article was derogatory towards both hams and CB operators.

Dee, N8UZE

On 25 Mar, 02:11, "Dee Flint" wrote:
I'll have to ask you to read the entire thread for yourself. I've no reason
or need to repeat everything. However my complaint was that the original
article was derogatory towards both hams and CB operators.

It would be difficult to find anybody that _hasn't_ been the target of
G4SDW's paranoid hatemail.