"Spike" wrote in message
...

Brian Reay wrote:

"G.A.Evans G4SDW" wrote in message
...

Might we all act together to produce a series
of "biscuits" that could then be assembled
Lego-like fashion to produce any rig or test
equipment?

A truely excellent idea Gareth.

Why don't you rough out a plan and design a few of these "biscuits" and
publish them on a website or maybe in one of the various journals that
support the hobby.

Good luck and I look forward to seeing your first designs.

I look forward to seeing the implementation of the design of the first
unit ever to incorporate the Big-K approach to DSP.

To be fair, I'd like to see some of his projects published and will even
offer to host them on a website- with full credit for their design etc.
attributed to Gareth.

--
73
Brian, G8OSN
www.g8osn.org.uk

Now your amateur licence is free, why not send at least £15 per year to
support the
Radio Communications Foundation or STELAR?

Brian Reay wrote:

"Spike" wrote in message
.. .

I look forward to seeing the implementation of the design of the first
unit ever to incorporate the Big-K approach to DSP.

To be fair, I'd like to see some of his projects published and will even
offer to host them on a website - with full credit for their design etc.
attributed to Gareth.

Quite so. It's just going to be interesting seeing how certain topics
he's posted on in the past turn out in reality.

A cynic might say that by involving others in the design, the
fall-guys are already being lined up ready for any failure that might
arise.
--
from
Aero Spike

"Spike" wrote in message
...

Brian Reay wrote:

"Spike" wrote in message
. ..

I look forward to seeing the implementation of the design of the first
unit ever to incorporate the Big-K approach to DSP.

To be fair, I'd like to see some of his projects published and will even
offer to host them on a website - with full credit for their design etc.
attributed to Gareth.

Quite so. It's just going to be interesting seeing how certain topics
he's posted on in the past turn out in reality.

A cynic might say that by involving others in the design, the
fall-guys are already being lined up ready for any failure that might
arise.

Well, if he comes up with some designs he is vindicated. If the biscuits
turn out to never to be at least half baked then you are vindicated.

He has suggested the idea, I've supported it and offered to host the designs
the ball is now in his court.

--
73
Brian, G8OSN
www.g8osn.org.uk

Now your amateur licence is free, why not send at least £15 per year to
support the
Radio Communications Foundation or STELAR?

Brian Reay wrote:

"Spike" wrote in message
.. .

Brian Reay wrote:

"Spike" wrote in message
...

I look forward to seeing the implementation of the design of the first
unit ever to incorporate the Big-K approach to DSP.

To be fair, I'd like to see some of his projects published and will even
offer to host them on a website - with full credit for their design etc.
attributed to Gareth.

Quite so. It's just going to be interesting seeing how certain topics
he's posted on in the past turn out in reality.

A cynic might say that by involving others in the design, the
fall-guys are already being lined up ready for any failure that might
arise.

Well, if he comes up with some designs he is vindicated. If the biscuits
turn out to never to be at least half baked then you are vindicated.

He has suggested the idea, I've supported it and offered to host the designs
the ball is now in his court.

Well, I still recall the FT-707 that was bought in order to implement
a DSP CW transceiver for 136 kHz.

It fell at the first hurdle as it wouldn't work on CW.

Despite receiving helpful suggestions via this medium, Gareth never
saw them due to 'an ISP failure'; and nothing more has been heard of
the project - at least on here.

--
from
Aero Spike

Mrs. Nugatory's lashing out in an infantile temper
tantrum now that she has been bested!

Any doubts that she's an anonymous cowardly poison-pen?

None, I think.

Now, Mrs. Nugatory, instead of displaying negative and
destructive tirades against me, why not discuss some of your
own projects and project ideas over the years? It is of course
extremely easy, some might say cowardly, to pick on someone
who has discussed ideas and possibilities over the years in an
attempt to promote the _REAL_ in _REAL_ Ham Radio, and
this picking-on is what you do. However, I think it more appropriate in a NG
for us all to contribute positively to promote the technical pursuit.

Go on! Dry your tears" You _CAN_ be a grown-up if you really try!

"Spike" wrote in message
...
"Spike" wrote in message
.. .
"Spike" wrote in message
.. .
I look forward to seeing the implementation of the design of the first
unit ever to incorporate the Big-K approach to DSP.
Quite so. It's just going to be interesting seeing how certain topics
he's posted on in the past turn out in reality.
A cynic might say that by involving others in the design, the
fall-guys are already being lined up ready for any failure that might
arise.
Well, I still recall the FT-707 that was bought in order to implement
a DSP CW transceiver for 136 kHz.
It fell at the first hurdle as it wouldn't work on CW.
Despite receiving helpful suggestions via this medium, Gareth never
saw them due to 'an ISP failure'; and nothing more has been heard of
the project - at least on here.