Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have long suspected that "Smiffy" is the name by which
Mr.Nugatory posts when at school, with carefully checked spelling to put us all off the scent. The times of posting by "Smiffy" since appearing last November are commensurate with that of a school-teacher. Both the subject matter and also the style of language, (in particular the condescending manner of an arrogant and deficient personality), in the below are so similar to that of Mr.Nugatory, that I am now convinced that "Smiffy" is, indeed, none other than our very own Mr.Nugatory, M3OSN! What better way after running away and hiding to sneak back in under an assumed ID?! "Smiffy" Smiffy@?.? wrote in message ... wrote: Is anybody interested in such a project and prepared to join with _REALISTIC_ non-nugatory support? I am sure that many people would be happy to join in the project, once they see that you are serious about it and have a good idea of the scope that you intend. Why not sketch out some rough ideas, block diagrams suggesting which biscuits would be needed initially (ideally I'd guess some building blocks which could be useful in their own right - e.g. VFO, amplifiers etc.), together with a proposal for how they should connect together - some kind of standardised backplane, a connector stack arrangement similar in concept to PC/104 (http://www.pc104.org/technology/PDF/...ec%20v2_5.pdf), something different entirely? What are you really thinking of here? Is it as simple as "every biscuit shall be either a Xcm * Ycm, or half sized X/2cm * Ycm" and allow free reign on electrical interfaces, or try to work out some kind of standard for general interface levels and protocols between biscuits? How do you envision the project being managed? What kind of collaboration methods would you use? The idea is sound, but to spark enthusiasm perhaps you should offer a little more than "Hey guys, let's build a radio". Collaborative projects either need a strong lead or a good previous track record of similar work. Even then take time to get going until people can see where you are heading and that they agree with it and feel they can be a useful part of the project. Throw some basics together, put a bit of flesh on your proposal, and I'm sure you'll get more people interested. It may well end up being you doing it on your own until the first biscuits are designed, but then it should gain momentum. Regularly publish what you are doing and where you are up to; a simple technical report and ignoring those who would shout you down (or a simple technical response, not falling down to "stupid boy" name calling) should gain you support. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Putting the "Real" back into _REAL_ Ham Radio | Homebrew | |||
Putting the "Real" back into _REAL_ Ham Radio | Policy | |||
Putting up an Imax | CB | |||
Putting up an Imax | Policy | |||
Putting ARRL back "mainstream" with hometown hams | Policy |