Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Harold E. Johnson" ) writes:
"Uncle Peter" ) writes: "Michael Black" wrote in message ... =?iso-8859-1?B?Rm9y52FDZWx0YQ==?= ) writes: Hello, It depends on what you need. Don't forget that the first single signal selectivity came to receivers in the thirties, via a single crystal filter. I'm suddenly blank about the name, but it was a balanced transformer feeding a crystal on one side and a trimmer capacitor on the other. You'd trim out the crystal holder's capacitance with the trimmer. Lamb? WAG. Certainly it was described first by Lamb, or he actualy came up with it, in that famous 1930's article about improving receivers. Basically a phasing crystal filter, which I suddenly was blank about when I posted. I'm not sure I've ever seen it called a "Lamb filter", though perhaps if you go far enough back in the books, it was once called that. Michael VE2BVW Actually, it wasn't. Don't recognize the famous 1930's article you refer to, but Lamb came up with the Lamb noise blanker. The principle of operation being to turn off the IF strip while the noise pulse was present, the "hole" being less noticeable and annoying than a huge noise spike. Walter Cady came up with the single crystal filter in 1922. Incorporated in most superhets during the years 1925 until the ladder, half lattice and full lattice filters came along in the 60's. The QST article is pretty famous, and at the very least is credited with bringing single signal selectivity to amateur radio (if not the world). I can't find a paper reference, but it might be an article titled something like "What's Wrong with our Present Receivers" from 1932 (though I thought the specific article had come later), and it may be referenced in Byron Goodman's January 1957 article of the same name. Everyone credits the article with bringing single selectivity to amateur radio, and I can immediately find some web references that claim (and I've read this somewhere in the paper literature) that Millen used many of the ideas in the article for the HRO receiver. The noise blanker may have been described in the same article. And of course, it was lattice and half lattice filters that came along in the fifties that allowed many to build SSB transmitters, if they couldn't afford mechanical filters and didn't want to use phasing. I never saw a reference to ladder filters (except for some oddball bit in the SSB column in the fifties that had two serial crystals and one going to ground where they joined) until the seventies, and it was more like a decade later before they became popular in hobby circles. Michael VE2BVW |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
WTB narrow CW filter for FT707 | Swap | |||
FA: narrow SSB filter FT301, FT7 @ $1.00 1 day! | Boatanchors | |||
FA: narrow SSB filter FT301, FT7 @ $1.00 1 day! | Equipment | |||
FA: narrow SSB filter FT301, FT7 @ $1.00 1 day! | Swap | |||
FS ICOM 735 with narrow CW filter $ 399 | Swap |