Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Distortion is more than harmonic distortion.
If any output does not replicate the input in amplitude and frequency response, there is distortion ... period! If a 1 Vp-p pure sine wave swept between 300 Hz and 3000 Hz goes into a device and produces an output of 2 Vp-p pure sine wave between 300 Hz and 3000 Hz there is a uniform gain of 2 and NO distortion. If a 1 Vp-p pure sine wave swept between 300 Hz and 3000 Hz produces 2 Vp-p at 300 Hz, then rises to 2.5 Vp-p at 1000 Hz and further rises to 2.8 Vp-p at 3000 Hz, the signal is distorted! The output is NOT a constant multiplier of the input. Run the test I posted. Or run it against a spectrum analyzer. Or, simply admit the output does not replicate the input. Lack of replication, in amplitude, frequency response or internal non-linearity, is distortion. A-D is specifying harmonic distortion ONLY. Speech compression is the deliberate introduction of distortion [to provide some desired result] In the recording industry, when analog recording was the norm, the recording studio distorted the recorded signal by the addition of 'pre-emphasis'. That is shaping the frequency response to compensate for known frequency variations in the recording media. The playback electronics may have had 'de-emphasis', depending upon recording media, to remove the effects of pre-emphasis and media distortion so that the output replicated the input. That is controlled distortion to achieve a desired result. Speech compression in radio-telephony is intentional distortion to achieve a perceived desired result. In mathematical terms TD = THD + dA/dF + dA/dT + dA/dV + d(Af(F))/dF ... should I continue? TD = Total distortion THD = Total Harmonic Distortion dA/dF = Intentional Amplitude variation as a function of frequency dA/dT = Amplitude variation as a function of temperature dA/dV = Amplitude variation as a function of bias voltage [AKA common mode, bias effects] d(Af(F))/df = Amplitude and gain variations as a function of gain roll off of the active device [a function of device gain rolloff [AKA gain*bandwidth product]]. I can add some more terms if you like. As a Chief Engineer I know and understand exactly what I am stating. A speech compression circuit deliberately produces a dA/dF, a variation in gain as a function of frequency, to achieve an intended result. It is distortion! As a company advertising and marketing a device, you should be precise in your language or define your terms explicitly. As far as I'm concerned this topic is dead, the funeral has been held, and the grave has been covered. I have no need to defend myself. Deek Telstar Electronics wrote: On Sep 19, 12:58 pm, Deek wrote: I'm sure they will acknowledge that it introduces controlled distortion. I'm surprised at you... being a chief engineer and all... you should realize that in this audio application we're talking strictly about harmonic distortion. After all, that's what you can hear. In the Analog Devices datasheet (page2)... this is given for the SSM2166 as "Total Harmonic Distortion including internal chip noise" of typical 0.25%... and a maximum of 0.5%. These figures rival the finest audio equipment! www.telstar-electronics.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Telstar Electronics VoiceMax IS GARBAGE! | Equipment | |||
Telstar Electronics VoiceMax IS GARBAGE! | Homebrew | |||
Worldwide Feedback Pouring in..Telstar Electronics VoiceMax is GARBAGE! | Homebrew | |||
Worldwide Feedback Pouring in..Telstar Electronics VoiceMax is GARBAGE! | Homebrew | |||
Worldwide Feedback Pouring in..Telstar Electronics VoiceMax is a Huge TURD! | Homebrew |