Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Long Range Wireless Network
Paul Keinanen wrote:
Assuming ordinary +20 dBm cards with 16 dBi antennas at both ends, you would end up to the +36 dBm EiRP (4 W) transmit power. Which puts you right at the legal limit for the U.S. If your transmitter is slightly higher power, or the antenna is more efficent you go over the limit. The free space loss at 32 km and 2.45 GHz is 130 dB, so the receiver would get -94 dBm, which is very little for broadband traffic, especially that figure does not contain the fade margin. In fact using +10 dBm cards and 26 dBi antennas would give 10 dB more receiving power. If I understand you correctly the EIRP would remain the same? Around 1980 I worked a place that used IR beams for high speed (4800bps), data and it worked until someone built a hotel in the way. :-) Geoff. -- Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel N3OWJ/4X1GM IL Voice: (07)-7424-1667 U.S. Voice: 1-215-821-1838 Visit my 'blog at http://geoffstechno.livejournal.com/ |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Long Range Wireless Network
In article ,
Paul Keinanen wrote: Running a 32 km LOS link is problematic in practice. At least the first Fresnel zone should be clear of obstacles. At midpoint you should have about 30 m free space _below_ the direct optical path (i.e. you would have to add 30 m to the antenna towers), but still you should have 10-20 dB fade margins for reliable operation. I understand that there's another issue with long links which can cause some problems. 802.11 cards are designed to automatically acknowledge packets received, and retransmit them if they aren't acknowledged promptly. This retransmission protocol is done by the card firmware, and occurs below the level of any operating-system packet acknowledgement or retransmission (e.g. TCP). The automatic-retransmission timeouts in the cards are set to a fairly short time-period, in order to improve throughput under typical usage conditions. A 32 km link is going to have a round-trip time of around 200 microseconds. If the transmitting card's timeout value is set to less than this, it'll start retransmitting the "lost" packet before a successful acknowledgement can come back. Lather, rinse, repeat. Traffic will actually get through, I gather... the successfully- received packets will be forwarded to their destination, even though the sending card thinks that they haven't been received (and logs them as "discarded, excessive retransmits"). Throughput suffers badly, though. Some cards and/or access points apparently allow the retransmission timeout value to be changed, to allow for sufficient speed-of-light travel time. -- Dave Platt AE6EO Friends of Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Long Range Wireless Network
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Long Range Wireless Network
You can try the Motorola Canopy system. We, at work, use both the 5.7 GHz
and the 900 MHz systems and get a good 20 to 30 KM range. The web site is http://motorola.canopywireless.com/solutions/ Norman wrote in message oups.com... I am trying to establish a wireless network for Internet Access, Video Conferencing and Intranet Applications, I though to use either a 2.4GHz Sector or Omni Directional Antenna would do the job but I can find any product that goes as far the distance I am trying to cover (a radius of 20Km). My idea is to use a powerful radio with the Antenna monted on a tall mast at the location of the internet feed (via VSAT), this location is idea for LOS at the other locations. Does anybody has experience/advise with this ? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Long Range Wireless Network
An ISP in my area has a rather large wireless network established, probably 30 miles from main office to my end of their network. I am at the far end of the network, about 12 access points "deep", meaning my traffic hops through 12 bridges-access points (repeaters) before it reaches the ISP's backbone. It works fairly well for internet browsing, better than I would have thought, but I've never tried internet telephony or video conferencing. That ISP is using 802.11b radios throughout the network, so the network certainly can't handle a lot of internet traffic, but it works.
|
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Long range rural wireless high speed data options... | Homebrew | |||
Securty missalany, wireless network DX ... | Shortwave | |||
problem with wireless bridge in workshop to home network | General | |||
Computer Wireless Network Interferance | Shortwave | |||
Wireless network | Antenna |