Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Lead free solder , was : REMOVING ENAMEL COATING
On Jun 7, 4:51�pm, Mike Silva wrote:
On Jun 7, 12:41�pm, Erich wrote: One of the biggest problems I have with the lead free solder is that over time it tends to grow tin whiskers. �Then it shorts out to adjacent pads. �Current reliability requirements are to encapsulate all the solder joints with epoxy. �This is painful and really causes problems with rework. No-lead; a feel-good solution to a non-problem. Erich N6FD http://nepp.nasa.gov/WHISKER/(check out the photo gallery) Wonder if the EU is going to pick up the eventual world-wide tab? EU doesn't have to. RoHS (Reduction of Hazardous Substances) is an in-country (European) specification that covers a LOT of different substances. In one way RoHS is no different than the FCC specification that forbids MARKETING of receivers than can listen to cellular telephone frequencies...or the way older specification that stated TV sets sold in the USA must be capable of tuning in UHF TV channels...or the FCC specification about linear RF amplifiers that can cover CB that aren't allowed to be sold IN the USA. RoHS is NOT an international specification. Manufacturers who sell ONLY in the USA and don't care to enter the European (or RoHS-member) markets aren't obliged in any way to obey RoHS standards. USA DoD contracts on electronics can use lead-bearing solders, no problem. NASA used CONFORMAL COATINGS or encapsulation on spacecraft electronics in the beginning of the 1960s. NOT for any sort of 'tin- whisker' problems but for the fact that microgravity environments all all kinds of small or large junk to float around freely. It MIGHT be that some teeny conductive junk could short out traces on a PCB in space. Hardly likely in an earth environment with gravity all the time. Those same conformal coatings were later found to inhibit the growth of CERTAIN metal whiskers (tin is not the only one). Except for one potting compound allowed back in the 1960s, such coatings and pottings were not epoxoids. The others were closer to offshoots of silicone elastomers and could be reworked. There are all sorts of coating compounds available now. Emerson & Cuming built their long-running business of providing all kinds of polymer compounds for the electronics industry. Those aren't cheap. No such products are. "Tin whisker" problems take a LONG time to show up. Usually it takes a half year for the first such whiskers' start to become visible under 100x magnification. Repeated heating-cooling tends to hasten such growth (of a sort of crystaline form of tin) but such studies aren't quite complete yet. But, once started, the growth can accelerate. Even that is not speedy. Thanks to MARKETING folks, there has been a lot of hysteria about this "tin- whisker" thing generated and picked up by all who have no experience in such things. A conformal coating will inhibt whisker growth. Even an ordinary varnish used on wood surfaces. I'd avoid the green 'solder- mask' stuff found on PCB assemblies which are used to prevent excess solder during wave- and reflow-soldering; it is tough stuff and much harder to remove if put on soldered pads/lands via additional coatings. I'd avoid lacquers because they leave a lot of stubborn ash behind if one MUST 'rework' something...despite their easy application and quick drying time and nice appearance after application. 73, Len AF6AY |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Removing PRO III Main tuning knob? | Equipment | |||
'Stripping' Enamel Wire. | Homebrew | |||
Toroids coating | Homebrew | |||
Need Help on Removing Viking 500 Front Panel | Boatanchors | |||
removing spanner nut | Scanner |