| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jun 25, 9:45*am, Tim Shoppa wrote:
I have been playing with homebrew crystal filters (following W7ZOI and Bill Carver/K6OLG) for CW, as well as audio filters, and can tell you that on CW the difference between a super-sharp-in-frequency Chesbyshev filter (typical in ham equipment for a long time now) and a more constant-delay (e.g. Gaussian to 6dB or 12dB, or equiripple linear phase) filter is like night and day. You wouldn't happen to know the group delay variance of the filters you mentioned? Rough values are okay. I notice you ask about a lot of digital modes but not CW. My ears have been listening to CW for 30-some years now and I can do a lot of processing in my brain. But what my brain cannot remove is horrible filter ringing. I don't know how those other digital modes stack up... maybe computers are better at removing horrible ringing than my brain. I believe that in theory if the exact group delay profile is known, then a digital receiver can perform a certain amount of equalization. What I'm curious about is how much varience can be introduced by the filters in a receiver for various transmission types without needing to equalize. -- John |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Degen DE1103 quality variation | Shortwave | |||
| variation of number station | Shortwave | |||
| interesting variation in the DA5 | Shortwave | |||
| OT Unique variation on regime change | Shortwave | |||
| Variation in modeling predictions between software | Antenna | |||