Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob wrote:
have been widely tested against some really serious, exotic receivers! If you only tested your tube receiver against *some* receivers then your claim about outperforming *all* SS receivers would be invalid. 'Absolute' statements will get you in trouble most of the time. I haven't seen /any/ digital processor that assists me in actually picking signals out of QRM. *You* not having seen any doesn't mean there aren't any. pseudo-selectivity given by digital filters with all their nasty artifacts) Selectivity is not usually my problem. With close neighbors and a low wire antenna, it's man made noise that is my problem. Digital does well with this. I'm happy for you if you're happy with your digital Rice Box Yes we have hams here that are also 'Rice Box' prejudiced. Prejudice for everything produced in Asia is silly these days. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|