Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey all:
I tore down a transformer I got from ebay it was a Zenith TV power transformer from days gone by. Re wound it with 17AWG wire on the secondary and primary. It powers up my 4-1000A filament nicely with 7.25VAC from 120VAC mains. I used a penta-filar winding on the secondary. Shimmed the bobbin in the core window with some 1/8 thick virgin teflon. Epoxied the windings to the bobbin. This was a 240VA transformer and now is a 83watt buzzer / 157watt filament transformer. So what is the cheapest I can gits away with sealing these laminations from buzzing, I used up all my epoxy sealing the windings. 73 n8zu |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
raypsi wrote:
Hey all: I tore down a transformer I got from ebay it was a Zenith TV power transformer from days gone by. Re wound it with 17AWG wire on the secondary and primary. It powers up my 4-1000A filament nicely with 7.25VAC from 120VAC mains. I used a penta-filar winding on the secondary. Shimmed the bobbin in the core window with some 1/8 thick virgin teflon. Epoxied the windings to the bobbin. This was a 240VA transformer and now is a 83watt buzzer / 157watt filament transformer. So what is the cheapest I can gits away with sealing these laminations from buzzing, I used up all my epoxy sealing the windings. 73 n8zu I've sealed rewound filter chokes by dipping them in a bucket of polyurethane varnish. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() I'll second that. Varnish is the best thing. Warm the varnish and the transformer first before you dunk it. That will reduce the viscosity and improve penetration. A little thinner in the pot may help too. Vacuum/pressure impregnation is better than dipping... but dipping can work well on a buzz. There is even special dipping resin to reduce noise that leaves the part looking like it's been dipped in a candy coating. It's a soft, rubbery, epoxy coating. Oh, and the teflon isn't so great as a shim. You might try nomex paper, G-10 PC board scraps, fish or kraft paper even typing paper, calendered cardboard (like shoe box cardbord) or wood. Teflon will withstand the heat but it tends to cold flow which makes it dimensionally unstable. The amount of mechanical force between the core halves can be surprising. Though in your transformer teflon may be be OK. In a choke it can be a source of bewilderment as the gap decreases. Yes, I've had this happen. Any material that will soften when it's hot, like perspex/plexiglas isn't a good choice either. I found this in an inductor for a 10KW boost converter that an otherwise reliable supplier built for me. For varnish, I like Dolphs (Von-Roll.) Failing that I use marine spar varnish. Some varnishes are corrosive to copper and over time will cause windings of fine guage to open if any copper is exposed. ken scharf wrote in : I've sealed rewound filter chokes by dipping them in a bucket of polyurethane varnish. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "ken scharf" wrote in message . .. raypsi wrote: n8zu I've sealed rewound filter chokes by dipping them in a bucket of polyurethane varnish. This would work even better if you could pull a slight vacuum on the bucket to get the air bubbles out. I believe that's how the manufacturer's did it. There was a thread on this over on AMFONE.NET a few month's back. pete k1zjh |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
As was suggested by Grumpy... missed it first time.
Pedro "Tio Pedro" wrote in message ... "ken scharf" wrote in message . .. raypsi wrote: n8zu I've sealed rewound filter chokes by dipping them in a bucket of polyurethane varnish. This would work even better if you could pull a slight vacuum on the bucket to get the air bubbles out. I believe that's how the manufacturer's did it. There was a thread on this over on AMFONE.NET a few month's back. pete k1zjh |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
A good trick for the lams is clear nail polish as you reassemble them.
Just a quick wipe, as it'll spread as you squeeze in the last few lams under a "Quick-Grip" clamp. Cheers! |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Uh! Sorry Ray, it was near 2AM and I misread this. Of course there's no gap in the core it's a linear AC transformer. No DC in the windings and so no gap. Usually I'd do everything I can to reduce any gap, inclduing interleaving the laminations, to reduce the magnetizing current. I just wasn't thinking, that happens sometimes. raypsi wrote in news:ea79280c-6148-42a5-be23- : Shimmed the bobbin in the core window with some 1/8 thick virgin teflon. Epoxied the windings to the bobbin. This was a 240VA transformer and now is a 83watt buzzer / 157watt filament transformer. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Grumpy The Mule wrote:
Uh! Sorry Ray, it was near 2AM and I misread this. Of course there's no gap in the core it's a linear AC transformer. No DC in the windings and so no gap. Usually I'd do everything I can to reduce any gap, inclduing interleaving the laminations, to reduce the magnetizing current. I just wasn't thinking, that happens sometimes. raypsi wrote in news:ea79280c-6148-42a5-be23- : Shimmed the bobbin in the core window with some 1/8 thick virgin teflon. Epoxied the windings to the bobbin. This was a 240VA transformer and now is a 83watt buzzer / 157watt filament transformer. Actually "transformers" that carry DC (IE: filter chokes) have a gap formed by putting ALL the "E"s in one direction and ALL the "I"'s in the other. For transformers that carry SOME dc (audio output transformers) group the "E"'s and "I"s in bundles and assemble with a few groups of bundles going in opposing directions. For transformers that carry ONLY dc (power, filament) alternate each lamination so no two in a row go the same way. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
ken scharf wrote:
Grumpy The Mule wrote: Uh! Sorry Ray, it was near 2AM and I misread this. Of course there's no gap in the core it's a linear AC transformer. No DC in the windings and so no gap. Usually I'd do everything I can to reduce any gap, inclduing interleaving the laminations, to reduce the magnetizing current. I just wasn't thinking, that happens sometimes. raypsi wrote in news:ea79280c-6148-42a5-be23- : Shimmed the bobbin in the core window with some 1/8 thick virgin teflon. Epoxied the windings to the bobbin. This was a 240VA transformer and now is a 83watt buzzer / 157watt filament transformer. Actually "transformers" that carry DC (IE: filter chokes) have a gap formed by putting ALL the "E"s in one direction and ALL the "I"'s in the other. For transformers that carry SOME dc (audio output transformers) group the "E"'s and "I"s in bundles and assemble with a few groups of bundles going in opposing directions. For transformers that carry ONLY dc (power, filament) alternate each lamination so no two in a row go the same way. I meant for transformers that carry ONLY AC! oops! |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Yep, It's all about core saturation. A large utility transformer can be saturated by just a few amperes of DC. Which is one reason improvements in load current THD are important. Zero sequence currents and all that jazz. ken scharf wrote in : ken scharf wrote: For transformers that carry ONLY dc (power, filament) alternate each lamination so no two in a row go the same way. I meant for transformers that carry ONLY AC! oops! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
WTB: 1000 VCT 6/5VAC XFORMER | Boatanchors | |||
What to do with lots of receivers and lots of antennas? | Shortwave | |||
Chicago Transformer Mod Transformer CMS-1 Specs wanted | Boatanchors | |||
SX-190 buzz in audio | Boatanchors | |||
SX-190 buzz in audio | Boatanchors |