Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
AF6AY wrote:
"Joerg" posted on Fri, Mar 20 2009 6:06 pm ken scharf wrote: JIMMIE wrote: On Mar 18, 9:24 pm, Robert casey wrote: I once saw an article in 73 magazine showing a HB receiver that used a re-worked turret tv tuner as a band switch. The coils were re-wound onto the original forms, but some have just replaced the forms with some of the smaller sized toroid cores. I have a bunch of old tv tuners in the junk box, but over the years the contacts have gone bad and now show a high resistance. Maybe they could be cleaned up, but it no longer seems worth the effort. My new idea is to use miniature relays to switch the circuits. I recently found nearly a gross of small relays for free so why not? Relays will most likely bring some grief over the years with contacts not conducting 100% and such. Better use band switching diodes or PIN diodes. I disagree based on some experience in environmentally testing relays ranging from high-power to low-power to 'choppers' in so-called stabilized (DC) amplifiers for military avionics, then doing comparative testing against the cheaper commercial relay designs on the market over 50 years ago. About the only "grief" is one can get is failure to wire it correctly or not understanding what relay contacts acually do or how to power their actuating coils. Power relays CAN result in contact pitting and poor resistance as a result of many multiple activations while carrying inductive loads of many Amperes of current with resulting very high voltage back-EMF ('flyback') conditions on contact separation. That is NOT the case with receiver bandswitching applications. Not even close. There are some unusual contact effects in so-called "dry" circuits carrying femtoAmpere currents or less but those won't affect high- impedance input and output circuits common to vacuum tubes. One of the better choices for no-nonsense, easier to implement bandswitch conversions without much cost is to use modern, easy-to-get small relays requiring only 100 to 150 mW coil powers, available in coil operating voltage increments of 6, 12, 18, 24 VDC...or, if salvaging older tube equipment, the "plate relays" of a half century ago designed for higher 12 to 30 VDC, comparable powers for a few mA of plate current in coils. [much harder to get now given all electronics is firmly in the solid- state era starting over 40 years ago] Some relay makers, such as Omron, are widely used in electronics, especially for automotive applications and are found listed in all major distributor catalogs. Relay contacts can easily withstand 200 to 400 VDC stock of now v. old (half-century ago). The make or break contacts do NOT involve any unusual RF impedance characteristics other than a few pFd of capacitance equivalent to ordinary point-to-point wiring or the lead-length inductance of some short point-to-point wire inductance in the low nanoHy range. It has an excellent open or closed contact condition with excellent isolation between actuating coil and contact set. By contrast, conventional rotary bandswitch structures designed around 60 to 70 years ago, are open to all sorts of contamination, including OXIDATION of contacts plus wear of typically cheap contact construction of a bygone era. Sealed or semi-sealed rotary switch wafers of the post-WWII era have much longer life than the old open-to-everything wafer designs that may look good in their first half decade, then degrade from oxidation after that, before normal wear effects show up. Based on over a decade of using the TV channel "turret tuner" (such as the cheap products of Standard Coil tuners of long ago) types just for TV channel selection, I wouldn't try to convert those to anything else than scrap. I'm being kind on that evaluation. The MECHANICS of such turret tuners may look good, but VHF-UHF circuits don't work on either mechanics or appearance. HF circuits might squeak by, but the typical contact set of turret tuners was never optimized for either wear or contact resistance. It was 'optimized' entirely for maximum profit from lowest-possible cost of components in a highly-competitive TV market of long ago. Today there are a number of inexpensive small relays used in HF radio equipment, especially in automatic antenna tuners (used for switching banks of binary-progression-values of inductors and capacitors) from direct microcontroller control of actuating coils. Those work very well and show no degredation running with 100 W of RF or more at 50 Ohm impedances. Millions of automobiles on the road today are tooling around with little packages of relays controlling everything from headlights to sensor selection in adverse temperature ranges and high vibration, no real problems from those relays. In short, small semi-sealed low-power relays are FINE for vacuum tube circuit switching in homebrew electronics, properly applied. They can easily replace most rotary bandswitching applications in layout with less stray circuit series-inductance and parallel-to-ground capacitance than with point-to-point wiring. Relays are ok in those applications, where there are actual currents flowing. What I meant was pure signal switching with no DC currents. Sealed relays, Reeds, mercury-wetted and such work quite well there. But non-sealed versions have issues and a snap-on plastic cap ain't a seal. Those problems became really nasty after we moved across an ocean and all this stuff was in a sea container for two months. After that almost all the band switching relays had problems, had to clean all of them. Now I am down to one sticky relay every couple month or so. Some I have replaced with PIN diode circuits and that, of course, made the issues completely go away. But it's always a hassle to do in an exisitng circuit. -- 73, Joerg |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Homebrew Double conversion tube receiver Not HBR | Homebrew | |||
Direct Conversion Receiver with NPN transistors | Homebrew | |||
Direct conversion + DSP receiver for S-measurements? | Homebrew | |||
double double (bi)quad - feed impedance? | Antenna | |||
Least expensive, Small, Digital, double reduction receiver | Shortwave |