| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#2
April 20th 09, 06:01 PM
posted to sci.electronics.design,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
|
|||
|
|||
If Superheterodyne, why not Subheterodyne?
In
Tim Shoppa wrote: A terminology question I suppose about the derivation of the term "Superheterodyne" more than anything else: Does the "Super" actually mean anything? My recollection is that Armstrong used the term "supersonic heterodyne" to note the fact that the beat frequency between the signal and LO was "supersonic." -- Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| superheterodyne in the future ? | Equipment | |||
| superheterodyne in the future ? | Equipment | |||
| Superheterodyne LO question | Homebrew | |||
| Superheterodyne LO question | Homebrew | |||
| Superheterodyne AM to SW conversion info | Homebrew | |||
Threaded Mode
