LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #28   Report Post  
Old April 21st 09, 08:39 PM posted to sci.electronics.design,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2006
Posts: 48
Default If Superheterodyne, why not Subheterodyne?

On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 23:02:59 -0700, Greegor wrote:

A 5-tubes superhet receiver made in Japan about 1955.


Notwithstanding I didn't see this line at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superheterodyne_receiver ,
when I was a kid, we had an "All-American Five" WELL before 1955.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_American_Five

Hope This Helps!
Rich

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
superheterodyne in the future ? Thierry Equipment 14 March 13th 04 08:33 AM
superheterodyne in the future ? Thierry Equipment 0 March 11th 04 10:01 PM
Superheterodyne LO question Liam Ness Homebrew 4 July 22nd 03 05:18 AM
Superheterodyne LO question Liam Ness Homebrew 0 July 21st 03 11:12 PM
Superheterodyne AM to SW conversion info Liam Ness Homebrew 4 July 13th 03 06:31 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017