Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2009-09-27, brian whatcott wrote:
... The leakage path for current in an insulated wire is strikingly different from the leakage path in a magnetic conductor - usually called a core or stamping. The leakage resistance can easily be 1000 megohms compared to the conductor's resistance of (say) 1 ohm. A ratio of a billion to one. The leakage path for cores and stampings is lucky to be a thousand times more "resistive" than the path through the core - if it's an iron stamping, an iron dust core, or a ferrite core. A ratio of a thousand to one. For air cored coils, the leakage path is lower still, so that the magnetic path does not couple all turns together at the best of times. If an end turn or two is shorted, the reactive current in the shorted turn pinches off most of the magnetic coupling from the remaining coil altogether, so the effect is not as dramatic as we might expect. Waddaya think of that? Thanks for this posting. You are totally right. I tried to explain thinks a little more easier. And if you try to reduce complexity in an explanation, you have to simplyfy. Looks like I simplyfied too much. My fault. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|