Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 13:41:23 -0500, "amdx" wrote:
Hi all, I saw a site where a fellow designed a unit to measure impedance at 2.4 ghz, for use on wifi antennas. I don't recall if it was return loss or impedance. It gave detailed instructions on how to build and he also had ready built units for sale. I think it was a ham that designed the unit. I also think he was not in the states, possibly a P or PY call sign, but the memory is not good! Any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Mike For the price of 1 tranceiver http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N0w5U0Xj1MU w. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:22:17 +0200, Helmut Wabnig hwabnig@ .- --- -.
dotat wrote: For the price of 1 tranceiver http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N0w5U0Xj1MU Clever but I think the OP wanted test equipment, not tuning methods. Also, I noticed that the markers were set to 2400.500 and 2900.500MHz instead of US band limits of 2400.0 and 2483.5Mhz. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jeff Liebermann" wrote in message ... On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:22:17 +0200, Helmut Wabnig hwabnig@ .- --- -. dotat wrote: For the price of 1 tranceiver http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N0w5U0Xj1MU Clever but I think the OP wanted test equipment, not tuning methods. Also, I noticed that the markers were set to 2400.500 and 2900.500MHz instead of US band limits of 2400.0 and 2483.5Mhz. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 So did the (plexiglas?) change the velocity factor for tuning. Ya, I'll take his test equipment. Mike |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 06:34:06 -0500, "amdx" wrote:
For the price of 1 tranceiver http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N0w5U0Xj1MU So did the (plexiglas?) change the velocity factor for tuning. The plastic raised the dielectric constant of the space between the patch and the ground plane. In effect, it increased the effective wavelength of the patch slightly, thus lowering its tuned frequency. You can (accidentally) get the same effect by tuning the antenna, and then placing it inside a PVC radome, which will also slower its tuning frequency. The author will probably find himself re-tuning the plastic piece after he's installed the patch antenna in an enclosure. Ya, I'll take his test equipment. Mike Build your own test equipment first. When that fails, mortgage the house, wife, kids, car, dog, cat, toys, etc and buy something better. However, beware of test equipment envy. Once you get on the test equipment upgrade path, nothing you own will be good enough, and there always will be something better. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How much can the impedance of coax vary from its characteristic impedance? | Antenna | |||
2.4ghz inverted V? | Antenna | |||
2.4ghz downconverter | Scanner |