Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014, gareth wrote:
Scouting around (plagiarising?) published designs for HR RXs and sundry boatanchors, it seems that where there are tuned RF stages, then 2 tank circuits seems to be the norm, and then only 3 ccts if the RX IF is ooo 455kHz when the coverage needs to extend to 30MHz. Looking at the rate of progress here (or lack of it!!) I am trying to conceive of a scheme to use up all the tuning condensers (capacitors only came in AFTER some of them were manufactured :-) ) in the junk box in one final big push to releve the executors of my will of difficult decisions :-) One reason for the superheterodyne receiver was to get away from the TRF reciver, which was some stages of tuned amplification on the signal frequency. Lots of problems once you started getting enough amplification. With the superhet, the RF stage before the mixer is there to offset the noisy mixer (which for most of the HF range isn't a problem) and to get rid of any images. The cheap ham and shortwave receivers of the old days would tend to have only one RF stage, and you'd see reviews for the commercial receivers with things like "the image was as strong as the desired signal". Some military receivers improved on that, and the HRO receiver was well known for better image rejection at the higher frequencies despite having a 455KHz IF. It had not only two stages of RF amplification, but apparently well designed tuned circuits. Double conversion was a better way to get rid of images. The first double conversion receivers tended to be to a low HF frequency, say about 2MHz, with a tuned circuit or two, then a drop to 455KHz for selectivity. That wave of receiver generally didn't have a lot of selectivity at the first IF frequency. Indeed, in a number of receivers, the mixer stage became another 455KHz IF amplifier on the lower frequencies where the double conversion didn't kick in. (Or to look at it in reverse, one of the 455KHz IF stages became a mixer on the higher frequencies when double conversion kicked in.) The other method at the time, if you had the money, was like the Collins 75A series receivers, which in effect were a tuneable receiver converting to 455KHz, with a crystal controlled converter ahead of that tuneable receiver. Those were all the same basic scheme, though some tuned a ham band directly, while others (like the Collins) tuned some other segment with the converter needed for all ham bands). But both double conversion schemes were as good as the tuned circuits. It was only when HF crystal filters came along that image rejection became much simpler. Pick a 9MHz filter, and the image is 18MHz away, not much needed to reject the image. At that point, you could do away with the RF stage, or at least keep it to a minimum, maybe just enough gain to offset the front end circuits. It's better to kick in amplification when needed than keep it in the circuit all the time, which is how more recent designs have gone. Once filters above the shortwave spectrum were viable, that really put the image frequency far away from the signal frequency. Some of the early up converting receivers just used a low pass filter ahead of the mixer (or had that as one of the options, I think the Racal receiver with the Wadley loop had this option, but I may be misremembering). With such a high IF, it was simpler to get rid of images. INdeed, one could basically build a receiver and leave off the front end selectivity. Build the receiver well to that point, then play with what comes between the antenna and the mixer. Got a really tough RF environment? Maybe a crystal filter at the signal frequency is the answer, so long as you only need a very small band of the spectrum. Put in simpler filtering for the bands that you don't care about, make it better for the one you do care most about. Or live with a low pass filter for general coverage. For a band that you might care about most, have a good filter that can be peaked on the signal, for some other band (or where you need to tune for a converter for the VHF/UHF bands) you might want a broadband filter that covers the 500KHz of the band, not requiring any tuning within that band. The point is that once you make the image rejection easier, you aren't fussing with image rejection, you are working on other things that is more important. Michael |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
design of frequency multiplicator stages | Homebrew | |||
(OT) : You Know - It's Just One of Those Stages They Go Through and They Will Grow Out of It . . . | Shortwave | |||
HX-50 Linearizing the output of the 2nd mixer & Driver stages - Help Please. | Boatanchors | |||
The Three Stages of a Wiener | Shortwave |