LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #18   Report Post  
Old February 18th 14, 11:42 PM posted to uk.radio.amateur,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2008
Posts: 618
Default The "Two Transistor challenge" - taking things a bit too far?

On Tue, 18 Feb 2014, gareth wrote:

"Michael Black" wrote in message
news:alpine.LNX.2.02.1402181359580.14557@darkstar. example.org...
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014, gareth wrote:
There was a time, back inthe 1920s and 1930s, that any active device
(valves in them thar days, tubes for the leftpondians) would cost nearly
a week's wages for the average working man, and so it was good economical
sense to try and use it as many ways as possible simultaneously.
Times have changes, and active devices with performance into the tens
of MegaHertz are now ten-a-penny, so what is achieved by competitions
such as the "Two Transistor Challenge" where it is the costs of switching
(manual, relays) which would be the major outlay?
Not carping, just curious.

There have always been "contests" like that, though sometimes they were
about "build a whole receiver using the same transistor type", or "build a
receiver without any ICs" after ICs had come around.


What I find intriguing is the realisation that valves ("tubes" to you?) can
be operated with only 12V on the anode.

That's not new. There were some articles in the various hobby electronic
magazines in the fifties and sixties about running them at low voltage,
"starved circuits".

Of course, that was about the time when new tubes came along that could be
run off low plate voltage, a sort of last gasp before transistors took
over. You'd see such tubes in car radios in a very specific time span,
tubes for the RF stages, maybe in the IF but those might have been
transistors, and then the audio stage. That period when tubes weren't yet
really good at radio frequencies.

Or the COllins R392, that used 28v plate voltage.

The best "starved circuit" was an article by John W. Campbell (of science
fiction fame) in CQ in the late fifties. It was about running a CRT at
relatively low voltage in an oscilliscope. It drove up sensitivity so you
could do away with amplification for many purposes (and thus the scope was
broadband) but you lost deflection and I think brightness. The scheme
came out of Bell Labs, he mentioned some specially built CRTs for the
purpose that included magnifiers.

Michael

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Are You Ready for "The Canadian {Shortwave} Challenge" thisFall-Winter B10 RHF Shortwave 0 October 2nd 10 09:38 PM
i can challenge you that "u can earn 10000$pm" online from HOME,OFFICE,CYBERCAFE... [email protected] Antenna 0 September 8th 07 07:17 AM
+ # 3 : -IF- Everyone Who Did Not Like The "Off-Topic" Posts Here Did Two Things . . . RHF Shortwave 0 March 26th 07 11:40 AM
How Many Of Those "Pain Pills" Is KB9RQZ Taking At A Time...??? K4YZ Policy 0 December 22nd 06 02:54 PM
ARRL "Homebrew Challenge" Tom Coates Homebrew 25 October 2nd 06 10:26 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017