LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #5   Report Post  
Old February 28th 14, 11:45 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Feb 2010
Posts: 27
Default Filters: Helical or lumped impedances?

On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 15:24:11 -0500, Michael Black wrote:

On Fri, 28 Feb 2014, Stuart Longland VK4MSL wrote:
Deciding on a suitable IF is the next challenge. The higher I make it,
the easier it becomes to make a filter that will reject images. I
considered a bog-standard 10.7MHz IF at first, but then considered what
would happen at 70cm where the band goes from 430-450MHz.

At one point, there was a wave of FM communication receivers that used
21.4MHz (twice 10.7MHz) IFs, so those should be reasonably available.
Of course, I've seen some odd filters in the HF range used in such
receivers too.

When early clunky cellphones were obsolete, I was able to buy some at
garage sales. This was the mid-nineties. They all had crystal filters
in the frequencies above 30MHz, some around 45MHz but also some around
70MHz if I remember. The good thing was they all converted a second
time to 455 or 450KHz, so there was a conversion crystal there too.

[…]
WIth all the recent portable shortwave receivers on the commercial
market,
there may be some now that are broken, offered up at a low cost, but
having an IF filter around 45MHz, and then a conversion to 455KHz or
450KHz, the latter filters not perfect for SSB but in some receivers
there is a narrower one than the AM filter.


I just had a look around, and found I can get an off-the-shelf crystal
filter for 45MHz, and a crystal for 44.545MHz. The filter has a 15kHz
bandwidth.

That sounds like a better combo. I was aware of IFs of 10.7MHz, wasn't
aware of 45MHz. 45MHz would work okay for what I'm doing.

The fun bit being now, working out how to best filter the image. Suppose
I wanted a signal on 146.400MHz… LO1 would need to be tuned to 101.400MHz
(it won't reach 191.4MHz). That'll give me an image at 56.4MHz.

I fiddled with doing filters to knock out such frequencies: the 45MHz IF
will be easier than 30MHz, but I still had a great deal of trouble
synthesizing a lumped impedance filter. Transmit is of particular
concern, since in addition, the filter has to handle high power. (If I
understand correctly, it goes *after* the PA to reject any harmonic
products from the amplifier?)

What rejection figures do people normally aim for when rejecting these
images?


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
4CX250B amp, with lumped output tuning MarkAren Homebrew 5 October 26th 05 02:54 AM
lumped balun balajisu Shortwave 1 July 7th 05 02:29 AM
Measuring transitor impedances Paul Burridge Homebrew 20 August 20th 04 12:23 AM
Rough guess at these impedances... Paul Burridge Homebrew 0 May 11th 04 07:49 PM
Lumped Load Models v. Distributed Coils Wes Stewart Antenna 480 February 22nd 04 02:12 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017