"Rambo" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 13 May 2014 15:46:48 +0100, "gareth"
wrote:

"Brian Reay" wrote in message
...

You have to ask yourself why he thinks those with successful careers in
engineering are wrong and he is always right.

What a peculiar thing to say?

Are you suggesting that at times that you post things that you think to be
wrong?

But I think that you're on a very sticky wicket by referring
to "those with successful careers in engineering ", after Stan G4EGH
described you in floods of tears down the phone to him after you
were terminated only a very few weeks after changing jobs.

What happened there, OM?

That's an interesting point Gareth, why exactly would some-one who had
such a successful career, take up teaching? Indeed he is so desperate
to attempt to feel superior that he spends half the night researching
the Royal Logistic Corps in order to attempt to another poster wrong!

The vocation of teaching is an indicator of a noble profession, but only
when
undertaken from graduation.

Those who "decide" to take up teaching at the age of 45 because their
"successful career" has been terminated and they cannot get another
job are just despicable.

When someone who _BOASTS_ of two degrees, one in electronics and the
other in mathematics talks such arrant nonsense about vector field theory
and makes false claims that the vector magnetic potential is a curl***** and
all is accompanied by gratuitous snide remarks, one
is forced to call into question exactly what nonsense he teaches and
whether or not he should be allowed to continue in a classroom?

The magnetic vector potential, A, is not a curl; however, the
magnetic field B comes from curl A.

(EOE, it is 20 years since Ii last looked at all this)