Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/22/2014 10:44 AM, gareth wrote:
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message ... "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message ... His problem is he couldn't understand what you said, so it added nothing to the conversation *for him*. I thought your explanation was quite detailed and eloquent. Too bad the troll isn't smart enough to understand it. But then that's pretty typical for him. He does it regularly. And I see he couldn't understand this explanation, either. Ah, yes, the troll has to pop in even when no one is replying to him! Go back to your CB buddies. Or won't they talk to you any more, either? It remains that I have to continue to play the role of the patient schoolteacher dealing with you as the disruptive infant in the kindergarten school. You seem intent on shouting out infantile abusive remarks at every turn. It does not reflect very well on your character. Shame on you. No, you ARE the disruptive infant in the kindergarten school. You could NEVER get a job a a teacher - kindergarten or otherwise. You have to have character to work with kids. And you even showed the judge you didn't have any. But then trolls never change. Really - you are TOO EASY. Now go back to your CB buddies. Or won't they talk to you any more? -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry, AI0K ================== |
#42
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/22/2014 10:42 AM, gareth wrote:
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message ... "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message ... "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message ... No, not a polymath. Polytroll is more like it. Polystoopid describes him exactly! It remains you have to continue to troll because you can't find an audience anywhere else. Why don't you go back to your CB friends? Or won't they talk to you any more, either? Just like you "played the role of the patient schoolteacher" with the judge? Got you shut up real quick, didn't it? Keep repeating it and you might actually start believing it! But no one else here will. Why don't you go back to your CB buddies? Or won't they talk to you any more, either? It remains that I have to continue to play the role of the patient schoolteacher dealing with you as the disruptive infant in the kindergarten school. You seem intent on shouting out infantile abusive remarks at every turn. It does not reflect very well on your character. Shame on you. No, you ARE the disruptive infant in the kindergarten class - just like you were in the courtroom when the judge shut you up for wasting the court's time. Now go back to your CB buddies. Or won't they talk to you any more, either? -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry, AI0K ================== |
#43
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/22/2014 4:35 AM, gareth wrote:
"rickman" wrote in message ... I am beginning to understand why you get a lot of flack here. If you aren't interested in discussing the topic, why do you keep responding? I am beginning to think you truly can't help yourself. Well, there you go again with the same bad behaviour for which you criticised Stuckle. Yes, I understand now. You continue to snip my entire post relating to the topic. You aren't here to discuss the arc of the key and wrist. You are here to create drama. I'm done with you. Feel free to have the last word. -- Rick |
#44
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/22/2014 1:09 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 7/22/2014 10:44 AM, gareth wrote: "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message ... "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message ... His problem is he couldn't understand what you said, so it added nothing to the conversation *for him*. I thought your explanation was quite detailed and eloquent. Too bad the troll isn't smart enough to understand it. But then that's pretty typical for him. He does it regularly. And I see he couldn't understand this explanation, either. Ah, yes, the troll has to pop in even when no one is replying to him! Go back to your CB buddies. Or won't they talk to you any more, either? It remains that I have to continue to play the role of the patient schoolteacher dealing with you as the disruptive infant in the kindergarten school. You seem intent on shouting out infantile abusive remarks at every turn. It does not reflect very well on your character. Shame on you. No, you ARE the disruptive infant in the kindergarten school. You could NEVER get a job a a teacher - kindergarten or otherwise. You have to have character to work with kids. And you even showed the judge you didn't have any. But then trolls never change. Really - you are TOO EASY. Now go back to your CB buddies. Or won't they talk to you any more? He was right about one thing. He managed to engage me in his infantile discussion. I am done. I see you still need to participate in his schoolyard taunting. -- Rick |
#45
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
... "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message ... "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message ... "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message ... No, not a polymath. Polytroll is more like it. Polystoopid describes him exactly! It remains you have to continue to troll because you can't find an audience anywhere else. Why don't you go back to your CB friends? Or won't they talk to you any more, either? Just like you "played the role of the patient schoolteacher" with the judge? Got you shut up real quick, didn't it? Keep repeating it and you might actually start believing it! But no one else here will. Why don't you go back to your CB buddies? Or won't they talk to you any more, either? No, you ARE the disruptive infant in the kindergarten class - just like you were in the courtroom when the judge shut you up for wasting the court's time. Now go back to your CB buddies. Or won't they talk to you any more, either? It remains that I have to continue to play the role of the patient schoolteacher dealing with you as the disruptive infant in the kindergarten school. You seem intent on shouting out infantile abusive remarks at every turn. It does not reflect very well on your character. Shame on you. |
#46
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
... "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message ... "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message ... His problem is he couldn't understand what you said, so it added nothing to the conversation *for him*. I thought your explanation was quite detailed and eloquent. Too bad the troll isn't smart enough to understand it. But then that's pretty typical for him. He does it regularly. And I see he couldn't understand this explanation, either. Ah, yes, the troll has to pop in even when no one is replying to him! Go back to your CB buddies. Or won't they talk to you any more, either? No, you ARE the disruptive infant in the kindergarten school. You could NEVER get a job a a teacher - kindergarten or otherwise. You have to have character to work with kids. And you even showed the judge you didn't have any. But then trolls never change. Really - you are TOO EASY. Now go back to your CB buddies. Or won't they talk to you any more? It remains that I have to continue to play the role of the patient schoolteacher dealing with you as the disruptive infant in the kindergarten school. You seem intent on shouting out infantile abusive remarks at every turn. It does not reflect very well on your character. Shame on you. |
#47
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"rickman" wrote in message
... On 7/22/2014 4:35 AM, gareth wrote: "rickman" wrote in message ... I am beginning to understand why you get a lot of flack here. If you aren't interested in discussing the topic, why do you keep responding? I am beginning to think you truly can't help yourself. Well, there you go again with the same bad behaviour for which you criticised Stuckle. Yes, I understand now. You continue to snip my entire post relating to the topic. You aren't here to discuss the arc of the key and wrist. You are here to create drama. I'm done with you. Feel free to have the last word. Well, there you go again with the same bad behaviour for which you criticised Stuckle. The situation is this; I suggested a new way of working, but you didn't want to talk about that and launched off into an irrelevance about the old way of working, which although no doubt true, was not appropriate. In passing, though, I chastised you for your rudeness, rudeness that you repeat above. Stupid boy. |
#48
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"rickman" wrote in message
... He was right about one thing. He managed to engage me in his infantile discussion. I am done. I see you still need to participate in his schoolyard taunting. Grow up, OM. |
#49
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/22/2014 1:10 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
No, you ARE the disruptive infant in the kindergarten class - just like you were in the courtroom when the judge shut you up for wasting the court's time. What is this about a judge? -- Rick |
#50
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/22/2014 1:40 PM, rickman wrote:
On 7/22/2014 4:35 AM, gareth wrote: "rickman" wrote in message ... I am beginning to understand why you get a lot of flack here. If you aren't interested in discussing the topic, why do you keep responding? I am beginning to think you truly can't help yourself. Well, there you go again with the same bad behaviour for which you criticised Stuckle. Yes, I understand now. You continue to snip my entire post relating to the topic. You aren't here to discuss the arc of the key and wrist. You are here to create drama. I'm done with you. Feel free to have the last word. Rick, Now you're beginning to understand... -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry, AI0K ================== |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Roy in action!! | Shortwave | |||
Mike States' arrant behavior needs corrective action. Why will eBay take no action? | Boatanchors | |||
looking for action sat | Policy | |||
Stevie Claims "action" more like missing in action most likely | Policy | |||
§97.1(a) and (e) in action | Policy |