Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 7 Oct 2014, Ralph Mowery wrote:
That way you could have a VFO going from 5 to 6 MHz and set the filter for about 8 MHz and anything above that would be filtered out. No harmonics or anything but a pure sine wave. But the problem is, most rigs aren't using that kind of design now. They are single conversion (with a 9MHz or so IF) or an upconversion to above 30MHz, so the "VFO" covers a large territory, and since most rigs are now general coverage (since now it's almost as easy as a hamband only rig), you need a lot more low pass filters. You're right, if this was in the old days, with a fixed range VFO, a low pass filter would be fine, since only one would be needed. As I said, not sure if this would work at RF or not, just something to think about. One reason Irving Hoff divided that unijunction oscillator output was because the unijunction put out a tiny pulse, which has a lot more harmonnc content, dividing it by 2 gave the waveforme a 50% square wave, which has harmonics, but not at every harmonic, so it's simpler to filter. There are better ways now. With almost the same amount of division (especially in this case since the unijunction oscillator frequency doesn't matter, so long as it's low enough to be stable), you can generate "stepped sinewaves" with a ripple counter and some weighted resistors, giving you a cleaner waveform that requires less filtering. That sort of thing was around not long after that Irving Hoff article, just a few years. Michael |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
an example of delerans accuracy | Shortwave | |||
an example of delerans accuracy | Shortwave | |||
an example of delerans accuracy | Shortwave | |||
Accuracy of Q meters | Antenna | |||
VU4 log accuracy... | Dx |