Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 12/2/2014 5:55 PM, wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 12/2/2014 1:11 AM, the well-known troll wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:

snip

I'm old enough that I've learned people like him just aren't worth
getting all upset over.

Then why bother responding at all?



Because I try to be polite

Since when?

Do you think calling people trolls, liars, incompetent, etc. is being polite?

If you were polite you wouldn't be in ****ing contests on a regular basis
that only stop when the other person no longer responds to you.



I am polite.

If you were polite you wouldn't be in ****ing contests on a regular basis
that only stop when the other person no longer responds to you.

calling people liers (sic).

If you were anything other than an egomaniacal ass, you wouldn't keep
bringing up a typo.


--
Jim Pennino

In rec.radio.amateur.homebrew Jerry Stuckle wrote:

ssnip

If it walks like a troll, quacks like a troll, and has the antecedents
of a troll, then it's a troll

And trolls don't understand there is a difference between apples and
oranges.

snip


ROFLMAO! You and a couple of other trolls who made ukram the cesspool
it is.

snip

And you still don't understand the difference between apples and
oranges. But trolls don't.

And he is off!!!



--
Jim Pennino

On 12/2/2014 8:57 PM, the well-known troll wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 12/2/2014 5:52 PM, the well-known troll wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 12/2/2014 7:15 AM, Lostgallifreyan wrote:
wrote in :

I'm old enough that I've learned people like him just aren't worth
getting all upset over.

Then why bother responding at all?


If you both cut each other a lot more slack, you'll both have more room to
maneouvre. For past couple of days you both reminded me of boxers in a
clinch, bounding together from rope to rope. Not a lot I can do about that,
but I can at least say how it looks.


Notice how he has to respond to my comments even when I'm not talking to
him? Another trait of a troll. The poor guy.

If you had been on USENET as long as you claim, you would know USENET is
an open forum and everybody is free to respond to anybody.

And you can shove your troll comment up your egomaniacal Stuckle.




Yes, I know USENET is an open forum for everybody. Including TROLLS
like you, unfortunately.

Then why the snide "he has to respond to my comments even when I'm not
talking to him"?

You can shove your troll comment up your egomaniacal Stuckle.



Can't stand the truth, Jimmy?

You're the admitted troll, Jimmy. And once again, you've lost it. Your
rage is getting to you.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K

==================

On 12/2/2014 8:59 PM, wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 12/2/2014 5:55 PM, wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 12/2/2014 1:11 AM, the well-known troll wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:

snip

I'm old enough that I've learned people like him just aren't worth
getting all upset over.

Then why bother responding at all?



Because I try to be polite

Since when?

Do you think calling people trolls, liars, incompetent, etc. is being polite?

If you were polite you wouldn't be in ****ing contests on a regular basis
that only stop when the other person no longer responds to you.



I am polite.

If you were polite you wouldn't be in ****ing contests on a regular basis
that only stop when the other person no longer responds to you.


No ****ing contest. It is impolite to ignore someone when they talk to
you. However, that does not mean you can't tell the truth and call a
troll a troll.

calling people liers (sic).

If you were anything other than an egomaniacal ass, you wouldn't keep
bringing up a typo.



You made it more than once, Jimmy. But once again, you're loosing it.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K

==================

On 12/2/2014 9:03 PM, the well-known troll wrote:
In rec.radio.amateur.homebrew Jerry Stuckle wrote:

ssnip

If it walks like a troll, quacks like a troll, and has the antecedents
of a troll, then it's a troll

And trolls don't understand there is a difference between apples and
oranges.

snip


ROFLMAO! You and a couple of other trolls who made ukram the cesspool
it is.

snip

And you still don't understand the difference between apples and
oranges. But trolls don't.

And he is off!!!



Yup, and I see you're trolling again. Just like you admit you do.

Are you going to lose it again? Poor boy.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K

==================

Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 12/2/2014 9:03 PM, the well-known troll wrote:
In rec.radio.amateur.homebrew Jerry Stuckle wrote:

ssnip

If it walks like a troll, quacks like a troll, and has the antecedents
of a troll, then it's a troll

And trolls don't understand there is a difference between apples and
oranges.

snip


ROFLMAO! You and a couple of other trolls who made ukram the cesspool
it is.

snip

And you still don't understand the difference between apples and
oranges. But trolls don't.

And he is off!!!



Yup, and I see you're trolling again. Just like you admit you do.

Are you going to lose it again? Poor boy.

Megalomaniac.


--
Jim Pennino

Fred Roberts wrote:
snip, educationally subnormal "special"
people who get the - ha ha - exam and answers read to them snip

I, for one, am very happy that our hobby has provision to accommodate
disabled individuals, through supply of reader and scribe assistance. Why
aren't you, Frank?

--
Stephen Thomas Cole // Sent from my iPhone

Brian Morrison wrote:
On Tue, 02 Dec 2014 13:19:30 -0500
Jerry Stuckle wrote:

Yes, but there is no indication the moderators of rram will take over
as moderators of ukrram.

I have not seen that suggested,

It's been implied many times.

what Spike is trying to say is that if
the initial moderation team disbands and is replaced, those
replacements could have any attitude and agenda and there would be no
recourse to any mechanism to prevent it.

Incorrect. At any point, any individual can RFD to remove/replace
moderators.

--
Stephen Thomas Cole // Sent from my iPhone

g8dgc wrote:
Spike wrote:

On 02/12/14 17:07, g8dgc wrote:
Spike wrote:

And we don't want Stuckle over here. Isn't the US big enough for you?

TINW

This is not working?

"There Is No We".

+1. I've never understood many of the anti squad's distaste of Americans,
it always seems to be bubbling away just under the surface, ready to show
its shameful face in an argument as it has here with Spike. Maybe a GI
nicked their girlfriend during the war and they're still smarting over it?

--
Stephen Thomas Cole // Sent from my iPhone

"Fred Roberts" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 01:11:48 +0000 (UTC), Brian Reay

Oh dear, Fred. What happened to your proposed KF?