On 01/12/14 18:21, Brian Reay wrote:

The more I see of the glaring ineptitude of some old time Full licence
holders on here, the more convinced I am that
there is a case for retesting Full Licensees.

Before that, there's the problem of those that haven't progressed.

The more I hear of the glaring ineptitude of some old time Foundation
and Intermediate licence holders on the bands, the more convinced I am
that there is a case for retesting them on a regular basis. And the
trainers too, and those that train the trainers. They all need
retesting, some in Basic English, it would appear.

--
Spike

"Hard cases, it has frequently been observed, are apt to introduce bad
law". Judge Rolfe

"Spike" wrote in message
...
On 01/12/14 18:21, Brian Reay wrote:

The more I see of the glaring ineptitude of some old time Full licence
holders on here, the more convinced I am that
there is a case for retesting Full Licensees.

Before that, there's the problem of those that haven't progressed.

The more I hear of the glaring ineptitude of some old time Foundation and
Intermediate licence holders on the bands, the more convinced I am that
there is a case for retesting them on a regular basis. And the trainers
too, and those that train the trainers. They all need retesting, some in
Basic English, it would appear.

What was that, that Reay was saying only recently about cross-posting
malicious abuse?

On Mon, 01 Dec 2014 20:00:37 +0000, gareth wrote:


What was that, that Reay was saying only recently about cross-posting
malicious abuse?

I believe he said that he was all in favour of it, and he applauded your
heroic efforts in the field.

HTH

On 01/12/14 21:14, Brian Reay wrote:
Spike wrote:
On 01/12/14 18:21, Brian Reay wrote:

The more I see of the glaring ineptitude of some old time Full licence
holders on here, the more convinced I am that
there is a case for retesting Full Licensees.

Before that, there's the problem of those that haven't progressed.

The more I hear of the glaring ineptitude of some old time Foundation and
Intermediate licence holders on the bands, the more convinced I am that
there is a case for retesting them on a regular basis. And the trainers
too, and those that train the trainers. They all need retesting, some in
Basic English, it would appear.

Yet again you introduce red herrings and make unsupported claims rather
than address the matter raised.

Yet again you introduce red herrings and make unsupported claims rather
than address the matter raised.

--
Spike

"Hard cases, it has frequently been observed, are apt to introduce bad
law". Judge Rolfe

"Spike" wrote in message
...
On 01/12/14 21:14, Brian Reay wrote:
Spike wrote:
On 01/12/14 18:21, Brian Reay wrote:
The more I see of the glaring ineptitude of some old time Full licence
holders on here, the more convinced I am that
there is a case for retesting Full Licensees.
Before that, there's the problem of those that haven't progressed.
The more I hear of the glaring ineptitude of some old time Foundation
and
Intermediate licence holders on the bands, the more convinced I am that
there is a case for retesting them on a regular basis. And the trainers
too, and those that train the trainers. They all need retesting, some in
Basic English, it would appear.
Yet again you introduce red herrings and make unsupported claims rather
than address the matter raised.
Yet again you introduce red herrings and make unsupported claims rather
than address the matter raised.

Indeed. The matter raised was using the tunable IF in older transceivers.