On 12/3/2014 10:15 AM, Spike wrote:
On 03/12/14 14:51, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 12/3/2014 4:23 AM, Spike wrote:
On 03/12/14 00:51, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 12/2/2014 6:20 PM, Spike wrote:

Are you an engineer or technician? You sound like one or the other.

Yes. And I have been for around 40 years.

Ah, now I understand.

The chap who is behind the RFD is the same chap who
brought 'order' to the US groups (and RRAM can be seen by all to be the
roaring success of this policy[1,2,3]), and the Charter and ModPol for
the proposed group being little more than a cut-and-paste job, even down
to the Americanisms.

[1] 61.7% blog posts

[2] Less than 1 post per day from individuals over 18 months

[3] The last gap between individual's posts was 4 days 2 hours.

TTFN

Which has absolutely nothing to do with ukram. They are two different
newsgroups, with two different audiences and two different moderation
teams. The only thing they have in common is the proposer of the RFD.

Plus the Charter and ModPol.

I don't expect you to see the Americanisms in there.


So what? Since you seem to be completely clueless, here's what must be
a huge enlightenment to you:

RFDs are not created from scratch. People almost always take the RFD
(and ModPol) of an existing group and just modify it for the new group.
And BTW - this happens not only in RFDs - it is a common practice
around the world in many different areas. And it's also not limited to
printed material.

And you'll find all moderated groups will have very similar Charters and
ModPols. In fact, I would highly expect that the RFD for rram was
copied from another moderated newsgroup's RFD.

Once again you're grasping at straws.

But that is immaterial since he has no say in the running of either
newsgroup, and anyone can create an RFD.

If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and has the antecedents of
a duck, it's a duck.


If it walks like a troll, quacks like a troll, and has the antecedents
of a troll, it's a troll.

Either that or your grasping at straws to try to make your argument.
And it isn't working.

But you don't seem to be able to understand the difference between
apples and oranges.

Don't go shopping for poultry, or you may be very disappointed.


You obviously can't understand the difference between apples and
oranges. Either that or you're grasping at straws, trying to make you
point - and failing miserably.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K

==================