On 12/3/2014 10:39 AM, Fred Roberts wrote:
On Wed, 03 Dec 2014 10:22:32 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
wrote:

[snip]

I have read the thread. To refresh your memory:

Ok..

Stephen:

I, for one, am very happy that our hobby has provision to accommodate
disabled individuals, through supply of reader and scribe assistance.
Why aren't you, Frank?

You:

Don't you start again or I'll start again, ok? CB radio and PMR 446
exists for such people...

An obvious bias against disabled people, even if you don't want to admit it.

Now then, Jerry I'll make this really simple for you as you are
clearly struggling to keep up. I am not talking about the disabled,
you have fallen for a red herring introduced by STC. Clear?


You specifically replied to a comment on the disabled. How can you NOT
be talking about the disabled?

[snip for brevity - your feel good about yourself stuff]

Where? You show a distinct lack of English comprehension and you are
guilty of falling for the propaganda posted by Cole and Reay oh, you
also talk crap.


By your statements, as noted above.

But you can't take back your words, so you start with the ad hominim
attacks.

I don't take back my words. I have nowhere discriminated against the
disabled. Nowhere. You seem to be incapable or unwilling to understand
what I actually posted. You Jerry, started the ad hominem attacks by
stating that I was prejudiced. I killfiled you over in UKNNC, I'm
about to do the same here.


You replied to a post specifically about the disabled.

Accusing someone of being prejudiced is not an ad hominim attack -
except to the thin skinned.

And do you REALLY think killfiling me hurts me in any way? ROFLMAO!

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K

==================

On 12/3/2014 10:40 AM, Spike wrote:
On 03/12/14 15:30, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 12/3/2014 10:15 AM, Spike wrote:

Which has absolutely nothing to do with ukram. They are two different
newsgroups, with two different audiences and two different moderation
teams. The only thing they have in common is the proposer of the RFD.

Plus the Charter and ModPol.

I don't expect you to see the Americanisms in there.

So what? Since you seem to be completely clueless, here's what must be
a huge enlightenment to you:

Ad hominem

RFDs are not created from scratch.

Only by the lazy, or those seeking some form of 'authority'.

People almost always take the RFD
(and ModPol) of an existing group and just modify it for the new group.
And BTW - this happens not only in RFDs - it is a common practice
around the world in many different areas. And it's also not limited to
printed material.

That explains a lot. What a glorious chance was missed here.

And you'll find all moderated groups will have very similar Charters and
ModPols. In fact, I would highly expect that the RFD for rram was
copied from another moderated newsgroup's RFD.

Ad populum.

Once again you're grasping at straws.

Ad hominem.


ROFLMAO!

If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and has the antecedents of
a duck, it's a duck.

If it walks like a troll, quacks like a troll, and has the antecedents
of a troll, it's a troll.

Oh, I'd agree with you there. But I'm a nice chap and overlook the
negative side of others.


ROFLMAO!

Don't go shopping for poultry, or you may be very disappointed.

You obviously can't understand the difference between apples and
oranges. Either that or you're grasping at straws, trying to make you
point - and failing miserably.

I've got a feeling I might get the point across, if I say it often enough:

If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and has the antecedents of
a duck, it's a duck.



You either can't understand the difference between apples and oranges,
or you are grasping at straws, trying desperately to make your point -
and failing miserably.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K

==================

On Wed, 03 Dec 2014 12:11:05 -0500, Jerry Stuckle wrote:

And do you REALLY think killfiling me hurts me in any way?

I sincerely I hope it does not.

plonk




--
M0WYM
Sales @ radiowymsey
http://stores.ebay.co.uk/Sales-At-Radio-Wymsey/

On 03/12/14 17:12, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 12/3/2014 10:40 AM, Spike wrote:

If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and has the antecedents of
a duck, it's a duck.

You either can't understand the difference between apples and oranges,
or you are grasping at straws, trying desperately to make your point -
and failing miserably.

I admit I'm not making my point as far as you are concerned, but that's
your problem, not mine. I could care less (US); I couldn't care less (UK).


--
Spike

"Hard cases, it has frequently been observed, are apt to introduce bad
law". Judge Rolfe

On 03/12/14 17:11, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 12/3/2014 10:39 AM, Fred Roberts wrote:
On Wed, 03 Dec 2014 10:22:32 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
wrote:

[snip]

I have read the thread. To refresh your memory:

Ok..

Stephen:

I, for one, am very happy that our hobby has provision to accommodate
disabled individuals, through supply of reader and scribe assistance.
Why aren't you, Frank?

You:

Don't you start again or I'll start again, ok? CB radio and PMR 446
exists for such people...

An obvious bias against disabled people, even if you don't want to admit it.

Now then, Jerry I'll make this really simple for you as you are
clearly struggling to keep up. I am not talking about the disabled,
you have fallen for a red herring introduced by STC. Clear?


You specifically replied to a comment on the disabled. How can you NOT
be talking about the disabled?

[snip for brevity - your feel good about yourself stuff]

Where? You show a distinct lack of English comprehension and you are
guilty of falling for the propaganda posted by Cole and Reay oh, you
also talk crap.


By your statements, as noted above.

But you can't take back your words, so you start with the ad hominim
attacks.

I don't take back my words. I have nowhere discriminated against the
disabled. Nowhere. You seem to be incapable or unwilling to understand
what I actually posted. You Jerry, started the ad hominem attacks by
stating that I was prejudiced. I killfiled you over in UKNNC, I'm
about to do the same here.


You replied to a post specifically about the disabled.

Accusing someone of being prejudiced is not an ad hominim attack -
except to the thin skinned.

And do you REALLY think killfiling me hurts me in any way? ROFLMAO!


The problem is Jerry, he never does kill file people. He would get lonely.

On 12/3/2014 12:34 PM, Brian Reay wrote:
On 03/12/14 17:11, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 12/3/2014 10:39 AM, Fred Roberts wrote:
On Wed, 03 Dec 2014 10:22:32 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
wrote:

[snip]

I have read the thread. To refresh your memory:

Ok..

Stephen:

I, for one, am very happy that our hobby has provision to accommodate
disabled individuals, through supply of reader and scribe assistance.
Why aren't you, Frank?

You:

Don't you start again or I'll start again, ok? CB radio and PMR 446
exists for such people...

An obvious bias against disabled people, even if you don't want to
admit it.

Now then, Jerry I'll make this really simple for you as you are
clearly struggling to keep up. I am not talking about the disabled,
you have fallen for a red herring introduced by STC. Clear?


You specifically replied to a comment on the disabled. How can you NOT
be talking about the disabled?

[snip for brevity - your feel good about yourself stuff]

Where? You show a distinct lack of English comprehension and you are
guilty of falling for the propaganda posted by Cole and Reay oh, you
also talk crap.


By your statements, as noted above.

But you can't take back your words, so you start with the ad hominim
attacks.

I don't take back my words. I have nowhere discriminated against the
disabled. Nowhere. You seem to be incapable or unwilling to understand
what I actually posted. You Jerry, started the ad hominem attacks by
stating that I was prejudiced. I killfiled you over in UKNNC, I'm
about to do the same here.


You replied to a post specifically about the disabled.

Accusing someone of being prejudiced is not an ad hominim attack -
except to the thin skinned.

And do you REALLY think killfiling me hurts me in any way? ROFLMAO!


The problem is Jerry, he never does kill file people. He would get lonely.



Hi, Brian,

ROFLMAO! IRDGAS if he does or doesn't. And I'll be that REALLY ****es
him off

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K

==================

On 12/3/2014 12:33 PM, Spike wrote:
On 03/12/14 17:12, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 12/3/2014 10:40 AM, Spike wrote:

If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and has the antecedents of
a duck, it's a duck.

You either can't understand the difference between apples and oranges,
or you are grasping at straws, trying desperately to make your point -
and failing miserably.

I admit I'm not making my point as far as you are concerned, but that's
your problem, not mine. I could care less (US); I couldn't care less (UK).



It's not only me - it's others here, also. And by continuing to try to
compare apples and oranges, you only make yourself look sillier (if
that's possible).

And now you're back to the "care less" argument, eh, Spike? You still
think you know more about U.S. idioms than people who live in the U.S.

Sillier yet!

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K

==================

"Fred Roberts" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 03 Dec 2014 17:34:51 +0000, Brian Reay wrote:
The problem is Jerry, he never does kill file people. He would get lonely.

When I killfile people I really do killfile them. You're the only
poster in here that I am aware of who was outed for running a bogus
killfile.

I shall apply to the Court of Human Rights (or whatever it's called at this
moment) for an order that I be placed in everybody's kill file. No
discrimination, everybody's kill file.
..
..
..
.... or maybe I'll just pour myself another drinK.
--
;-)
..
73 de Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI - mine's a pint.
..
http://turner-smith.co.uk

On 03/12/14 21:03, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 12/3/2014 12:33 PM, Spike wrote:
On 03/12/14 17:12, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 12/3/2014 10:40 AM, Spike wrote:

If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and has the antecedents of
a duck, it's a duck.

You either can't understand the difference between apples and oranges,
or you are grasping at straws, trying desperately to make your point -
and failing miserably.

I admit I'm not making my point as far as you are concerned, but that's
your problem, not mine. I could care less (US); I couldn't care less (UK).

It's not only me - it's others here, also. And by continuing to try to
compare apples and oranges, you only make yourself look sillier (if
that's possible).

And now you're back to the "care less" argument, eh, Spike? You still
think you know more about U.S. idioms than people who live in the U.S.

Sillier yet!

Thanks for confirming that you don't understand what's going on.


--
Spike

"Hard cases, it has frequently been observed, are apt to introduce bad
law". Judge Rolfe

On 03/12/2014 19:26, Brian Reay wrote:
Stephen Thomas Cole wrote:
g8dgc wrote:
Spike wrote:

On 02/12/14 17:07, g8dgc wrote:
Spike wrote:

And we don't want Stuckle over here. Isn't the US big enough for you?

TINW

This is not working?

"There Is No We".

+1. I've never understood many of the anti squad's distaste of Americans,
it always seems to be bubbling away just under the surface, ready to show
its shameful face in an argument as it has here with Spike. Maybe a GI
nicked their girlfriend during the war and they're still smarting over it?

Americans tend to have a low tolerance for bovine muck.


You've been watching that George Carlin video haven't you?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CsT0S0575HU [NSFW]

--
Mouse.
Where Morse meets House.