LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #7   Report Post  
Old February 6th 15, 07:30 PM posted to uk.radio.amateur,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 702
Default FM for the Eddystone EA12?


"Michael Black" wrote in message
news:alpine.LNX.2.02.1502061353050.21109@darkstar. example.org...
But Ralph is complaining about a signal that is both AM and FM.

INtentional FM is different from incidental FM.

Certainly in the US (and I assume Canada), rules were in effect quite a
few decades ago about the stability of a signal. There was a point where
a signal had to be as stable as a crystal controlled signal on the HF
bands, which caused a shift to crystal control, I think that was even
before WWII. So incidental FM would seem to be out of the question after
that. It was only after WWII when things got crowded and better
techniques came along that VFOs made a comeback, obviously much better
built and stable than the variable oscillators of the old days. (And the
same sort of rule followed as the move up to higher frequencies. Modulated
oscillators would work the higher frequencies initially, then the rule for
better stability would come in, and the modulated oscillators would move
to the next higher band, and so forth).

If a signal is putting out both FM and AM, it is either doing it by
accident, and needs fixing, or is some weird form or modulation, that the
rules would either have a separate classification for, or a rule against
it.


I was not really complaining about the signal, just noting that it sounded
beter on FM than AM.

What might have been state of the art around 1930 or 1940 is probably not
legal now. Just as the old spark gap transmiters are not legal any more.
The station was suspose to be using AM, but probably the power supply was
not regulated enough that fed the audio amp and also the VFO so that the
changing of the VFO voltage was enough to FM the signal.

As you say Michael the design was for AM, but some of the old sets seem to
put out as much FM as they did AM. That was just the way it was 60 or 70
years ago. Especially some of the portable military gear.

Anyway I have no complaints about some guys having fun with the old gear as
long as they stay on or very near one frequency like they do.


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Eddystone 958/7 Aleksandar Shortwave 1 March 18th 06 05:56 AM
FS: Eddystone EA12 shortwave receiver D Equipment 0 June 27th 04 11:21 PM
FS: Eddystone EA12 shortwave receiver D Equipment 0 June 27th 04 11:21 PM
eddystone John Plimmer Shortwave 1 May 7th 04 12:32 PM
eddystone wil Shortwave 1 May 5th 04 09:15 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017