Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I might even consider a type 1 core for that 160 meter coil. The type 6
specified in the web page seems like an unlikely choice for that frequency. Reading the article, he indicated it didn't work that well when he used chokes in the tank, which is pretty close to what you will have with the ferrite cores. Presumably you're in the U.S., you can get toriods pretty cheaply (and quickly) from http://kitsandparts.com, although he does sell them in big bunches. You can order oneseys from http://www.palomar-engineers.com but in my experience they are pretty slow, and by the time you pay their shipping, you may as well have spent the same money at kitsandparts and gotten ten times as many toroids. ... "Roy Lewallen" wrote in message ... The transformers in that circuit are tuned; that is, they're basically tank circuits with a secondary winding for impedance transformation. So type 43 ferrite would be a very poor choice, since it has a Q of 1 at a few MHz. You need a core material that maintains a decent Q at the frequency of interest. Type 61 isn't too awfully bad from a Q standpoint at lower HF, but you'll have a very strong temperature dependence. There are a couple of other 60 series ferrites that might be better -- check out the Fair-Rite web site. I'd use a bigger powdered iron core, myself. Going to type 2 material will reduce the required number of turns, and will probably reduce the Q only slightly. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Jason Hsu wrote: Yes, this is related to the noise cancelling device described at http://www.geocities.com/g4lna/noisdes.html I'm trying to figure out if I can substitute type 61 or type 43 ferrites for the transformers, because I have these ferrite ring cores but I do not have the iron powder toroids. Also, using type 43 ferrites would allow me to use fewer turns. (That 160m/180m transformer requires about 50 turns!) From my experience with high-power RF transformers, I know that iron powder toroids are less vulnerable to core saturation and excess heating. The phase shifter and the amplifier in the noise cancelling device do NOT work with high power levels like a transmitter, tuner, or SWR/wattmeter would. So if core saturation and excess heating are not an issue, is there any particular reason I MUST use iron powder instead of ferrites? Jason Hsu, AG4DG |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Wanted: Power Supply for TR-4C | Boatanchors | |||
Wanted: Power Supply for TR-4C | Equipment | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna | |||
Purchasing Ferrite Cores for Balums | Antenna |