LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9   Report Post  
Old October 18th 03, 01:14 AM
Mike Coslo
 
Posts: n/a
Default

David Stinson wrote:

When CW replaced spark, it was going to
"make the hobby too complicated and expensive to continue."


Who said that?

When SSB came on the ham scene, "Donald Duck"
was going to "destroy the hobby."


Who said that?

When FM and repeaters came along, they were
"against the spirit of ham radio. You might as well use a telephone!"


Who said that?

When Packet appeared, they brayed:
"those 'brrrrappp!' signals are denigrating the hobby!"


Who said that?

Throughout our history, hecklers and naysayers have been full of beans.
And they're full of beans now.


So if people are not "for" whatever comes along is full of beans?

In the next rewrite, I'm taking out all references to BPL.


And when BPL appeared, those naughty naysayers thought it was a bad
thing too.

So I guess those who don't like BPL are full of beans?

- Mike KB3EIA -

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to convert spectrum data in audio ? Thierry Equipment 0 October 10th 04 05:45 PM
A New Concept: Virtual Spectrum Martin Potter Boatanchors 22 November 24th 03 06:25 PM
A New Concept: Virtual Spectrum Dr. Anton Squeegee Digital 3 October 15th 03 08:40 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017