Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/27/2015 7:29 AM, gareth wrote:
I wonder if anyone here has experience of milling PCBs using CNC rather than etching them, and if so, what pitfalls and pratfalls were encountered? Years ago a place I worked had one of the machines that cost a few thousand. It wasn't great as they hadn't provided a good base so the board could be inserted multiple times with the same registration or easily flipped for double sided. The bits were conical rather than flat tipped and tended to break easily. In the end the company went belly up and we were stuck with proprietary software that was no longer maintained. The only people who really used it much were the RF guys... ![]() Some in s.e.d use a mounting technique of soldering bits of double sided PCB onto a board of copper clad as soldering islands. No etching needed. Not the greatest appearance, but it is very fast and simple to make and you do have a decent ground plane even if you don't have good impedance controlled runs... maybe. I expect you could find a wire with the appropriate thickness insulation for a given impedance and glue it to the copper clad. Think microstrip. -- Rick |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , rickman wrote:
On 5/27/2015 7:29 AM, gareth wrote: I wonder if anyone here has experience of milling PCBs using CNC rather than etching them, and if so, what pitfalls and pratfalls were encountered? Years ago a place I worked had one of the machines that cost a few thousand. It wasn't great as they hadn't provided a good base so the board could be inserted multiple times with the same registration or easily flipped for double sided. The bits were conical rather than flat tipped and tended to break easily. In the end the company went belly up and we were stuck with proprietary software that was no longer maintained. The only people who really used it much were the RF guys... ![]() There are still fast-prototyping PCB milling machines which do this. They don't seem to have a really big market - "quick turn" fabrication houses are plentiful and are usually quick enough. In-house milling seems to be mostly for "We've gotta have this *today*" applications, or for the occasional situation where one is too afraid of having the details of the PCB "leak" to a competitor before the product comes out. From what I've heard, one of the problems with this approach is that milling the copper off of the PCB isn't a trivial problem. Copper is soft and flexible enough that it can tend to clog the bit, or stretch-and-tear rather than milling off of the substrate cleanly. Some hobbyists do it with (e.g.) Zen CNC systems, or Dremel-based CNCs, etc. I know there's software out there which can read in a Gerber file, and produce a file of G-code commands which will mill out an isolation zone around each trace or area plotted by the Gerber. As with an etched PCB, you'd want to fill as much as possible of the unused space with ground plane (or unconnected fill zones) so that you don't end up having to mill away lots of copper. Using carbide bits would (I think) be essential - high-speed steel probably won't stand up to FR4 for very long. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ian Jackson wrote on 2/2/2014 3:46 PM:
On 5/27/2015 7:29 AM, gareth wrote: I wonder if anyone here has experience of milling PCBs using CNC rather than etching them, and if so, what pitfalls and pratfalls were encountered? Years ago a place I worked had one of the machines that cost a few thousand. It wasn't great as they hadn't provided a good base so the board could be inserted multiple times with the same registration or easily flipped for double sided. The bits were conical rather than flat tipped and tended to break easily. In the end the company went belly up and we were stuck with proprietary software that was no longer maintained. The only people who really used it much were the RF guys... ![]() Yeah, a place I worked had one of these, likely the same company as theirs went belly up too. RF guys use double sided often if not always. Digital stuff often needs more layers. The island breadboard approach is even more limited being effectively single sided and entirely unsuitable for any type of high density packages. So again, mostly used for RF type of designs. -- Rick C Viewed the eclipse at Wintercrest Farms, on the centerline of totality since 1998 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
RF Filter PCBs | Shortwave | |||
RF Filter PCBs | Equipment | |||
AR88s and PCBs | Boatanchors | |||
where to get burs for Dremeling PCBs? | Homebrew | |||
Making PCBs | Homebrew |