| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#31
November 16th 03, 11:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 09:48:50 -0800, Bill Turner
wrote: On 16 Nov 2003 16:56:27 GMT, (Michael Black) wrote: I'd certainly put in a buffer for an output, as a signal generator or to feed a frequency counter. The latter then means the dial doesn't require much effort, and the readout will be much much better than any GDO from before. _________________________________________________ ________ This would be a good way to go in the sense of not requiring a calibrated dial, but a GDO is necessarily a broadly tuned device simply because a single tank circuit is a broadly tuned device. A high degree of precision is neither needed nor even possible. ....because frequency it is pulled when dip occurs and when you adjust excitation for best reading on the meter Still, I like the concept. -- Bill, W6WRT 73 LA8AK -- remove ,xnd to reply (Spam precaution!) |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Grid Dip Meters | Equipment | |||
| Grid Dip Meters | Equipment | |||
| Grid Dip Meters | Equipment | |||
| Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #649 | Dx | |||
| Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #649 | Dx | |||
Threaded Mode
