Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill Turner ) writes:
Also, a GDO is likely to be much less expensive than the three separate items. Bill, W6WRT That's always been some of its appeal. Throw one together, or buy one, and you get a tool for finding the rough frequency of a coil. But you also get that ability to figure out an unknown L or C, you get a signal generator, you get a wavemeter (which also still has potential use), you get a general purpose oscillator that you can connect a crystal to, and you get likely some other uses that don't immediately come to mind. They date from a time, late forties is when they started becoming popular but I'm uncertain if the concept was there before, when the average ham had little test equipment, and even labs and repair places might not have all that much of it. It was a handy little unit, relatively easy to build, that did give good returns. Of course, a lot of recent equipment isn't conducive to as easy use with a GDO, with self-shielding toroids and the rest shielded in cans. Construction isn't nearly as wide open as in the days of tubes. But whether it's worth having likely depends on a mindset. If someone wants to load down on tons of test equipment, then a GDO is likely redundant. But a GDO can have its uses, especially if one doesn't have a wide-range signal generator. Michael VE2BVW |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Grid Dip Meters | Equipment | |||
Grid Dip Meters | Equipment | |||
Grid Dip Meters | Equipment | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #649 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #649 | Dx |