| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 09:49:49 -0800, Bill Turner
wrote: On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 14:45:47 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell" wrote: I told the cal lab the label should read, "Calibration not possible". ;-) -- _________________________________________________ ________ LOL! -- Bill, W6WRT A decade ago I had a struggle with those instruments idiots referring to ISO 9000, had an old fully working 30 years old Wande&Goltermann SPM-1 instrument for telex channels, with mark and space marked, but they would give me a new digital possibly from HP, costing in the region of $10000 - without the channel marks, but solid state. After a dispute they agreed to check the calibration, and it was better than they could measure, so they had to let it pass, but I damaged their day! I was told that if any tubes broke down it was forbidden to change them, and it was a political decision to discard such old instruments 73 Jan-Martin LA8AK http://home.online.no/~la8ak/c.htm -- remove ,xnd to reply (Spam precaution!) |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Grid Dip Meters | Equipment | |||
| Grid Dip Meters | Equipment | |||
| Grid Dip Meters | Equipment | |||
| Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #649 | Dx | |||
| Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #649 | Dx | |||