Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
I have used the 1Q5 with 18 volts and it worked well. It worked better with
27 volts. Bill, N5NOB |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
I have used the 1Q5 with 18 volts and it worked well. It worked better with
27 volts. Bill, N5NOB |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Bruce Kizerian wrote:
But it does matter. In the heirarchy of regen devices tubes provide the "smoothest" regeneration, followed by FETs, with bipolar transistors generally taking a distant third. I am not asking because I have never built a regen. I have built DOZENS of them, and I sell a simple version on my website...but I'm always looking for a new approach. My first regen RX was in 1947 with an A415 direct filament triode. (Does anyone remember it?) It was followed by DC11 - a steel 1.5 V filament tube - both excellent ones for regen receivers. (We used to call them Audions.) Bruce says there are three types of regens : with tubes, with FETs and with bipolar transistors. There is also a forth type: a negative resistance reganeration receiver, an invention of mine (also known as Lambda receiver). You can find its scematic in the British QRP Club's magazine SPRAT: number 111, page 4 - with a correction in number 112, page 25, and a complete construction in SPRAT 113, page 17 - with a correction in SPRAT 114, page 24. The schematic is a simulation of a tunnel diode and works in the negative part of the U/I characteristic. It does not have a feedback coil, and the regeneration is very soft - so the worst problem has been solved. Its stability is not convenient for CW or SSB, but it is excellent for broadcast stations from 500 kHz to 30 MHz; a real project for beginners. If someone duplicates it, I will be happy to hear about his experience - by e-mail . hr) or on this group. Best wishes, Bozidar, 9A2HL |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Bruce Kizerian wrote:
But it does matter. In the heirarchy of regen devices tubes provide the "smoothest" regeneration, followed by FETs, with bipolar transistors generally taking a distant third. I am not asking because I have never built a regen. I have built DOZENS of them, and I sell a simple version on my website...but I'm always looking for a new approach. My first regen RX was in 1947 with an A415 direct filament triode. (Does anyone remember it?) It was followed by DC11 - a steel 1.5 V filament tube - both excellent ones for regen receivers. (We used to call them Audions.) Bruce says there are three types of regens : with tubes, with FETs and with bipolar transistors. There is also a forth type: a negative resistance reganeration receiver, an invention of mine (also known as Lambda receiver). You can find its scematic in the British QRP Club's magazine SPRAT: number 111, page 4 - with a correction in number 112, page 25, and a complete construction in SPRAT 113, page 17 - with a correction in SPRAT 114, page 24. The schematic is a simulation of a tunnel diode and works in the negative part of the U/I characteristic. It does not have a feedback coil, and the regeneration is very soft - so the worst problem has been solved. Its stability is not convenient for CW or SSB, but it is excellent for broadcast stations from 500 kHz to 30 MHz; a real project for beginners. If someone duplicates it, I will be happy to hear about his experience - by e-mail . hr) or on this group. Best wishes, Bozidar, 9A2HL |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Bruce Kizerian wrote:
But it does matter. In the heirarchy of regen devices tubes provide the "smoothest" regeneration, followed by FETs, with bipolar transistors generally taking a distant third. I am not asking because I have never built a regen. I have built DOZENS of them, and I sell a simple version on my website...but I'm always looking for a new approach. I built my first regenerative receiver in 1947 with an A415 direct filament tube, followed by one with a steel DC11 - 1,5 V direct filament tube - both excellent ones for the purpose. (Does anyone remember them?). Bruce says there are three types of regen receivers: the tube ones, the ones with a FET, and the ones with bipolar transistors. However, there is also a fourth one: the negative resistance reganerative receiver, known also as a Lambda receiver . The oscillator is a transistor immitation of the tunnel diode, and the negative resistance substitutes the feedback coil. It is my own construction. You can find its schematic in the British QRP Club magazine SPRAT No. 111, page 4 (with a correction in No. 112, page 25). The whole construction with a PCB has been published in SPRAT No. 113, page 17 (with a correction in SPRAT 114, page 24). The RX does not have a feedback coil, and the regeneration is very smooth and rather even over the whole band. So, that problem has been solved for good. It is not stable enough for CW or SSB, but it is excellent for AM broadcast stations from 500 kHz up to 30 MHz (with corresponding coils, of course). So, according to my opinion, it is excellent for beginners because they do not have to bother with the feedback coils. If anyone would care to duplicate it, I would appreciate it very much if I could hear about his experiences with it (on this group or by e-mail: ). The whole project is still open for experimentation. Best wishes, Bozidar, 9A2HL |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Bruce Kizerian wrote:
But it does matter. In the heirarchy of regen devices tubes provide the "smoothest" regeneration, followed by FETs, with bipolar transistors generally taking a distant third. I am not asking because I have never built a regen. I have built DOZENS of them, and I sell a simple version on my website...but I'm always looking for a new approach. I built my first regenerative receiver in 1947 with an A415 direct filament tube, followed by one with a steel DC11 - 1,5 V direct filament tube - both excellent ones for the purpose. (Does anyone remember them?). Bruce says there are three types of regen receivers: the tube ones, the ones with a FET, and the ones with bipolar transistors. However, there is also a fourth one: the negative resistance reganerative receiver, known also as a Lambda receiver . The oscillator is a transistor immitation of the tunnel diode, and the negative resistance substitutes the feedback coil. It is my own construction. You can find its schematic in the British QRP Club magazine SPRAT No. 111, page 4 (with a correction in No. 112, page 25). The whole construction with a PCB has been published in SPRAT No. 113, page 17 (with a correction in SPRAT 114, page 24). The RX does not have a feedback coil, and the regeneration is very smooth and rather even over the whole band. So, that problem has been solved for good. It is not stable enough for CW or SSB, but it is excellent for AM broadcast stations from 500 kHz up to 30 MHz (with corresponding coils, of course). So, according to my opinion, it is excellent for beginners because they do not have to bother with the feedback coils. If anyone would care to duplicate it, I would appreciate it very much if I could hear about his experiences with it (on this group or by e-mail: ). The whole project is still open for experimentation. Best wishes, Bozidar, 9A2HL |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks everyone for the interesting and useful information.
For the record, I am not particularly in love with tubes, but if there is something they will do better than solid state devices I'm willing to give it a try. When I can buy PN2222 bipolars for $.02ea and PN4416 JFETS two for a quarter, and dual gate MOSFETS for a nickel, the expenditure for one of those fragile glass things better be well worth it. It can' be different or just a little better. It has to be "knock your socks off" superior...I make radio kits for kids and schools and I want them to be able to afford the purchase. Bruce kk7zz www.elmerdude.com |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks everyone for the interesting and useful information.
For the record, I am not particularly in love with tubes, but if there is something they will do better than solid state devices I'm willing to give it a try. When I can buy PN2222 bipolars for $.02ea and PN4416 JFETS two for a quarter, and dual gate MOSFETS for a nickel, the expenditure for one of those fragile glass things better be well worth it. It can' be different or just a little better. It has to be "knock your socks off" superior...I make radio kits for kids and schools and I want them to be able to afford the purchase. Bruce kk7zz www.elmerdude.com |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
People here have recently mentioned tubes intended for portable
operation, with plate voltages of around 20 volts. Much more common are tubes intended for running from mains-powered supplies. These mostly require plate voltages that can be lethal. You should consider this when designing kits for kids. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Bruce Kizerian wrote: Thanks everyone for the interesting and useful information. For the record, I am not particularly in love with tubes, but if there is something they will do better than solid state devices I'm willing to give it a try. When I can buy PN2222 bipolars for $.02ea and PN4416 JFETS two for a quarter, and dual gate MOSFETS for a nickel, the expenditure for one of those fragile glass things better be well worth it. It can' be different or just a little better. It has to be "knock your socks off" superior...I make radio kits for kids and schools and I want them to be able to afford the purchase. Bruce kk7zz www.elmerdude.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
wtd: EF Johnson Challenger Mobile Radios and Remote Heads | Equipment | |||
Kenwood TM-V7A crossband repeat and remote control? | Equipment | |||
WTB: TS-520S REMOTE Plug Not ext. VFO Plug | Boatanchors | |||
Remote antenna switching | Antenna | |||
wtd: EF Johnson Challenger Mobile Radios and Remote Heads | Equipment |