| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
It wouldn't be quite the same. You would be clipping the sidebands, and
experience quite a bit of distortion. A 110kHz filter is about as narrow as you can go. I've been meaning to come up with a tuner that would be in the class of a McIntosh MR78 for the past couple of years, but something has always come up. Maybe after my current project, I will do this, if there is enough interest. Pete Richard wrote in message ... Dr. A.T. Squeegee wrote: In article , says... Hi. Anybody developed a nbfm RX project covering the FM band (appx 87.5Mhz-108Mhx). NBFM? As in narrow band? What would be the point? Here in the U.S. at least, that entire band is assigned to FM broadcasting, and it is anything but narrow-band. Typical deviation from a broadcast station is 75+ kHz. Maybe I used the wrong term. I think lots of HiFi tuners have very wide filters much greater than 75 Khz. For DXing it seems then you need no more than say 75Khz. A tuner with that bandwidth would, in a sense, (Ithink) compared to a regular HiFi tuneer be a narrow bandwidth tuner. BTW, what would be the result if you used say a 20Khz filter on a FM signal with 75 Khz deviation? Would you get distortion or a perfectly copyable signal. I mean is it the analagous to using a 2Khz filter for an AM signal transmitted at 6Khz wide? |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Assistance with Ham Projects | Dx | |||
| Assistance with Ham Projects | Dx | |||
| Publications for Ham Homebrew Projects ?? | Homebrew | |||
| 1.2GHz Antena projects wanted | Antenna | |||
| FYI: Antanna Projects Roundup | Antenna | |||