Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 17:26:14 -0600, "Henry Kolesnik"
wrote: Over the last few years I've acquired quite a few consumer electronincs pcbs including TVs, VCRs, stereos, etc, so when I discovered that I needed a tantalum to repair some test equipment I was going to salvage a tantalum. I couldn't find one anywhere, so I assume they're too expensive or too unrelaible for high end consumer electronics. A couple of the boards were from my personal stuff purchased new. One example is a MGA Mitsubishi rear projection TV that operated flawlessly for nearly 20 years of daily use. Most of my test equipment comes from hamfests and is surplus after becoming obsolete and non-operative in less than 20 years. That leads me to wonder what the real story is behind tantalum capacitors. What do the experts have to say? tnx hank wd5jfr We often use surface-mount tantalums on high-density, high-cost boards. They are very reliable (don't dry out like aluminums) if used carefully, but high peak currents can ignite them, so they are generally a bad idea for bypassing power rails. Polymer aluminums (don't dry out) or polymer tantalums (don't explode) seem like a good idea, but I haven't tried them yet. I think multilayer ceramics are pushing 100 uF these days. John |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Electrolytic caps question | Boatanchors | |||
Electrolytic caps question | Homebrew | |||
Electrolytic caps question | Boatanchors | |||
Electrolytic caps question | Equipment | |||
Electrolytic caps question | Homebrew |