Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Consumer electronics are costed down to the lowest possible level. If
they can use something cheaper, they WILL use something cheaper. A TV Well, maybe. Any manufacturer who has been nailed with thousands of dollars in warranty costs caused by saving a penny might disagree with your statement. I've seen it happen. Caused by bad engineering (or purchasing), I would say. "Costing down" does not mean "making inappropriate component substitutions", and I wasn't suggesting or advocating such a policy. It means, quite simply, going over the circuit and seeing where a cheaper design or a cheaper, _compatible_ substitute can be used. If the device has a 12 month warranty, and it dies after that period expires, then nobody really cares which component was the first to fail. Especially in disposable consumer electronics! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Electrolytic caps question | Boatanchors | |||
Electrolytic caps question | Homebrew | |||
Electrolytic caps question | Boatanchors | |||
Electrolytic caps question | Equipment | |||
Electrolytic caps question | Homebrew |